The tag alias #64126 without_panties -> no_underwear has been rejected.

Reason: topic #40609

EDIT: The tag alias without_panties -> no_underwear (forum #378049) has been rejected by @faucet.

The tag alias without_panties -> no_underwear (forum #378049) has been rejected by @faucet.

The bulk update request #6489 is active.

create alias without_panties (0) -> no_underwear (18665)

Reason: Although it currently has no posts, it has seen some use, so I believe it'll benefit from futureproofing

See previous discussion at topic #40609

EDIT: The bulk update request #6489 (forum #390256) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6489 (forum #390256) has been approved by @slyroon.

I know it's a bit late to say this, but... what if they're not wearing panties but are wearing a bra? bra implies underwear, so...

sipothac said:
I know it's a bit late to say this, but... what if they're not wearing panties but are wearing a bra? bra implies underwear, so...

no_panties was aliased to no_underwear in 2016 tbh it confuses me as well.

definitelynotafurry4 said:
no_panties was aliased to no_underwear in 2016 tbh it confuses me as well.

honestly, despite being a euphemism I kinda like going_commando...