The bulk update request #5618 is active.

create implication endosoma (1436) -> safe_vore (2014)
create implication full_tour (423) -> safe_vore (2014)

Reason: Endosoma and Full_tour are tags that describe situations where prey is not digested. By implicating them to Safe_Vore, the tag should become more useful.

Regurgitation is not included, because the regurgitation tag includes the regurgitation of objects, which are often proof of digestion instead of proof of it's absence.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5618 (forum #377970) has been approved by @slyroon.

There also does seem to be a considerable amount of mistags in safe_vore.

Some of them are quite obvious. You can't see a lack of digestion before prey gets past the throat.
post #4149218 post #3887902

Others are less clear. There's nothing suggesting or contradicting endosoma in the images here, so safe vore should be removed.
post #4282362 post #3830044 post #3636296

The bulk update request #7796 is pending approval.

create implication safe_vore (2014) -> vore (69520)
remove implication endosoma (1436) -> vore (69520)

Reason: Safe vore should imply vore, and if the above BUR passes endosoma would imply vore through safe_vore

I was wondering if full_tour should imply endosoma, but endosoma requires an extended stay

Also is safe_vore a subset of soft vore? If so the implication might need to be redirected

"safe vore" feels like a bit of a misnomer since when I see it I think of the rating, where vore is almost never safe

Better rename it to rating:innocent then

The bulk update request #5618 (forum #377970) has been approved by @slyroon.