The bulk update request #5573 has been rejected.

create implication eating_burger (15) -> eating (21062)
create implication eating_burger (15) -> burger (4370)

Reason: Character is eating a burger. Seems straighforward.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5573 (forum #377023) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Should imply eating_food instead of eating

I'm not really sure if we should have a tag for eating every type of food though

Is this getting too specific for tags?

Should be an alias. eating_food burger should get most of what you want without needing such a specific tag.

post #4158738

strikerman said:
Is this getting too specific for tags?

Maybe we can alias it to eating_fast_food to be less specific, but that would be the same as eating_food. Maybe an eating_burger tag is okay imo

The bulk update request #5578 is active.

create alias eating_burger (15) -> eating_food (2820)

Reason: yeah, I agree that it's served well enough by eating_food burger.

Should it alias to eating_food or to burger? I'm leaning towards eating_food because burger seems like it'd be more obvious to tag separately.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5578 (forum #377113) has been approved by @slyroon.

eatinaburgerwitnohoneymustard

I opened Pandora's box, didn't I. Looking back at it, perhaps this was a bad bulk request to make. Someone did bring up how overwhelming making specific tags would be.

eating_pizza implies eating_food now so I guess we are doing eating_<specific food> tags after all?

The bulk update request #5573 (forum #377023) has been rejected by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #5578 (forum #377113) has been approved by @slyroon.

cloudpie said:
eating_pizza implies eating_food now so I guess we are doing eating_<specific food> tags after all?

No, we aren't. I removed the implication and alias "eating_pizza" to "eating_food" because 'eating_[food]' tags are too specific to be useful.