Topic: [REJECTED] building implications

The bulk update request #5502 has been rejected.

create implication building_sex (610) -> building (30166)
create implication building_insertion (177) -> building (30166)
create implication building_penetrated (469) -> building (30166)
create implication holding_building (74) -> building (30166)
create implication sitting_on_building (172) -> building (30166)

Reason: all of these tags require buildings

EDIT: The bulk update request #5502 (forum #375711) has been rejected by @WizardMagican.

You should imply building_insertion & building_penetrated to building_sex since they are listed as major subcategories, then imply building_sex to building.

The bulk update request #5504 is pending approval.

create implication building_insertion (177) -> building_sex (610)
create implication building_penetrated (469) -> building_sex (610)
create implication building_sex (610) -> building (30166)
create implication holding_building (74) -> building (30166)
create implication sitting_on_building (172) -> building (30166)

Reason: is this correct?

The bulk update request #5502 (forum #375711) has been rejected by @WizardMagican.

You could edit the original bur instead of making a new one and rejecting the old one.