Topic: Tag Implication: blue_sky -> sky

Implicating blue_sky → sky
Link to implication

Reason:

I'm not sure if it's worthwhile to tag blue_sky at all (since it is the default color), but it should at least be implicated. Since more than third of those are missing the sky tag.

Also: red_sky → sky

+1 for implication at least. We can always alias it later if it matters.

Red_sky should be implicated though since that's definitely a more unique type of sky.

Blue sky tends to be kind of the default sky color, so I'd be for alias on it. To me it'd make more sense only to tag sky color if it were something outside the norm.

That aside, agree that it should at least be implicated. +1

Implication works. We can have the wiki page for sky mention something along the lines of the default types of sky being blue_sky or cloudy_sky.

It is a bit debatable if we need it. But since sky tends to be undertagged to begin with, I think I'll just implicate it for now. I think we'll be able to see more clearly whether or not it's useful over time as they get used more. In theory, I could see that it might be useful to distinguish from black night, fantasy skies, artistic effects tinting the sky a funny color, sunsets, etc. It does make it easy to find that and only that without minus-ing a lot of other options from the search. So I'm just going to implicate it for now and see how it fares over time.

So, approving the implication of both to --> sky.