Implicating cat_ears → feline
Link to implication
Reason:
I know this is a huge topic of debate, but I know a lot of these tend to get tagged "cat" or "tiger" as well.
Personally I don't see anything wrong with that. Honestly when I type "cat" I expect cat-like things to show up. You can easily have a generic cat ears/tail, or have a character with ears/tail/personality that is distinctly "tiger-like". Why shouldn't this fit under the things you'd expect with tiger?
Benefits:
Cat_ears posts get tagged with cat more often than not. This would reduce the need to clean up something that seems like it would be intuitive (tag cat_ears/catgirl with cat). Thus someone tagging cat_ears catgirl tiger would actually be putting everything in the correct place.
Also, unlike other systems I've seen which tend to alienate the catgirl-type tags, this would actually fit within our current framework without too many changes.
Drawbacks:
Honestly I see none. It's a lot more intuitive than what we have right now.
Considerations:
I'd like to avoid things like snow_leopard_ears, etc. because it could get very clunky, but I'm not sure what would be included or excluded. We should probably limit these to a handful if possible, but as long as the correct chains of implications are in place it shouldn't matter.
Related request:
- Alias: human_on_anthro, etc. -> humanoid_on_anthro, etc.
- Implication: cat_ears, etc. -> humanoid
Previous discussion: forum #151354
Updated