The bulk update request #5350 is active.

Reason: Implications for new characters from RUIN and a few characters that didn't had Implication before (surprised Gregory didn't). Added some tags that don't exist yet for when they inevitably get made when someone posts said character.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5350 (forum #373142) has failed: Error: ruined_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) already implies five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach through another implication (create implication ruined_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) -> five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach)

EDIT: The bulk update request #5350 (forum #373142) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Perhaps they should all imply five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach_ruin instead, since all of those characters come from the DLC and not the main game.

Nevermind. I saw topic #39672

zenith-pendragon said:
Perhaps they should all imply five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach_ruin instead, since all of those characters come from the DLC and not the main game.

I don't think we need a separate tag for the DLC. It's still part of Security Breach, so the first line should be an alias instead of an implication. I also don't think the shattered_ and ruined_ character tags need to the _(fnaf) suffix, since they're unique enough already.

watsit said:
I don't think we need a separate tag for the DLC. It's still part of Security Breach, so the first line should be an alias instead of an implication. I also don't think the shattered_ and ruined_ character tags need to the _(fnaf) suffix, since they're unique enough already.

Pretty much every Fnaf tag I've seen has the (fnaf) at the end of it so I figured it's just tradition at this point. Like even if you search (fnaf) on the search bar it'll implicate to the nornal five_nights_at_freddy's tag.

watsit said:
I don't think we need a separate tag for the DLC. It's still part of Security Breach, so the first line should be an alias instead of an implication. I also don't think the shattered_ and ruined_ character tags need to the _(fnaf) suffix, since they're unique enough already.

Also, I just think it'd be good to search for content related to the DLC without having the need to search for a character from it.

watsit said:
I don't think we need a separate tag for the DLC. It's still part of Security Breach, so the first line should be an alias instead of an implication. I also don't think the shattered_ and ruined_ character tags need to the _(fnaf) suffix, since they're unique enough already.

FNAF characters all end with the _(FNAF) suffex, shattered and ruined with Roxy are two different looking models

Added additional implications so the Shattered/Ruined ones implicate their original selves as well

mcdonaldschicken15 said:
Added additional implications so the Shattered/Ruined ones implicate their original selves as well

Different forms are tagged separately and shouldn't imply each other, otherwise it makes it hard to find when both forms are in the same post (link_(wolf_form) doesn't imply link, mega_blaziken doesn't imply blaziken, etc).

watsit said:
Different forms are tagged separately and shouldn't imply each other, otherwise it makes it hard to find when both forms are in the same post (link_(wolf_form) doesn't imply link, mega_blaziken doesn't imply blaziken, etc).

Ah I see, I'll fix it

The bulk update request #5350 (forum #373142) has failed: Error: ruined_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) already implies five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach through another implication (create implication ruined_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) -> five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach)

The bulk update request #5350 (forum #373142) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #7218 is active.

Reason: Removing the _(fnaf) suffix since they aren't necessary:
roxanne wolf
glamrock chica
montgomery gator
all don't have the fnaf suffix.
Followup:
alias shattered_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) -> shattered_roxanne_wolf
alias shattered_glamrock_chica_(fnaf) -> shattered_glamrock_chica
alias shattered_montgomery_gator_(fnaf) -> shattered_montgomery_gator
alias ruined_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) -> ruined_roxanne_wolf
alias ruined_glamrock_chica_(fnaf) -> ruined_glamrock_chica
alias ruined_montgomery_gator_(fnaf) -> ruined_montgomery_gator
alias ruined_glamrock_freddy_(fnaf) -> ruined_glamrock_freddy

EDIT: The bulk update request #7218 (forum #397085) has been approved by @slyroon.

Additionally, do we want the ruined_[character] tags to imply five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach_ruin or would implying five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach be enough?

The implication from security breach ruin -> security breach has been approved, and the ruin_* tags are from the DLC.

The bulk update request #7219 (forum #397090) has been rejected by @SNPtheCat.

snpthecat said:
Additionally, do we want the ruined_[character] tags to imply five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach_ruin or would implying five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach be enough?

The implication from security breach ruin -> security breach has been approved, and the ruin_* tags are from the DLC.

Now that the Ruin tag is in place, I don't see why we shouldn't connect our tags to it.

The bulk update request #7218 (forum #397085) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #7316 is active.

create alias shattered_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) (10) -> shattered_roxanne_wolf (34)
create alias shattered_glamrock_chica_(fnaf) (3) -> shattered_glamrock_chica (25)
create alias shattered_montgomery_gator_(fnaf) (7) -> shattered_montgomery_gator (10)
create alias ruined_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) (3) -> ruined_roxanne_wolf (24)
create alias ruined_glamrock_chica_(fnaf) (3) -> ruined_glamrock_chica (1)
create alias ruined_montgomery_gator_(fnaf) (0) -> ruined_montgomery_gator (0)
create alias ruined_glamrock_freddy_(fnaf) (0) -> ruined_glamrock_freddy (0)

Reason: Followup

EDIT: The bulk update request #7316 (forum #397985) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #7316 (forum #397985) has been approved by @slyroon.

The tag implication cassie_(fnaf) -> five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach has been rejected by @spe.

The tag implication ruined_roxanne_wolf_(fnaf) -> five_nights_at_freddy's:_security_breach has been rejected by @spe.