Topic: slit_play BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #5216 is pending approval.

create implication slit_penetration (2081) -> slit_play (2800) # duplicate of implication #11941
create implication slit_fingering (339) -> slit_play (2800) # duplicate of implication #29758
create implication slit_vore (23) -> slit_play (2800)
create implication slit_tribadism (8) -> slit_play (2800)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (36) -> slit_penetration (2081)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (36) -> mutual_penetration (1007)
create implication double_slit_penetration (21) -> slit_penetration (2081)
create implication double_slit_penetration (21) -> double_penetration (31535)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (69) -> tentacle_penetration (14440)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (69) -> slit_penetration (2081)
create implication penis_in_slit (394) -> slit_penetration (2081) # duplicate of implication #50523
create implication tail_in_slit (28) -> slit_penetration (2081)
create implication tail_in_slit (28) -> tail_play (10111)

Reason: this should make it a lot easier to find the various types of activities involving genital slits. I've left out slit_licking, oral_slit_play, tongue_in_slit, and frottage_in_slit because I'm not really sure what should be done with those.

Hmm, 3 of those are duplicates of existing implication requests... and those 3 should probably get approved, but sooooo long of backlog. Also, these all look reasonable.

I wasn't sure if I should leave out the duplicate suggestions especially since half of these implications kinda rely on slit_penetration implying slit_play, and that suggestion has been pending for 5 years now, and I'm not really sure what i should do when that happens.

Don't necessarily agree with slit_vore implying slit_play (is oral_vore mouth_play?) but otherwise ๐Ÿ‘

  • 1