Topic: slit_play BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #5216 is pending approval.

create implication slit_penetration (2741) -> slit_play (3637) # duplicate of implication #11941
create implication slit_fingering (419) -> slit_play (3637) # duplicate of implication #29758
create implication slit_vore (27) -> slit_play (3637)
create implication slit_tribadism (13) -> slit_play (3637)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (44) -> slit_penetration (2741)
create implication mutual_slit_penetration (44) -> mutual_penetration (1211)
create implication double_slit_penetration (22) -> slit_penetration (2741)
create implication double_slit_penetration (22) -> double_penetration (37404)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (95) -> tentacle_penetration (19255)
create implication tentacle_in_slit (95) -> slit_penetration (2741)
create implication penis_in_slit (568) -> slit_penetration (2741) # duplicate of implication #50523
create implication tail_in_slit (31) -> slit_penetration (2741)
create implication tail_in_slit (31) -> tail_play (11946)

Reason: this should make it a lot easier to find the various types of activities involving genital slits. I've left out slit_licking, oral_slit_play, tongue_in_slit, and frottage_in_slit because I'm not really sure what should be done with those.

Hmm, 3 of those are duplicates of existing implication requests... and those 3 should probably get approved, but sooooo long of backlog. Also, these all look reasonable.

I wasn't sure if I should leave out the duplicate suggestions especially since half of these implications kinda rely on slit_penetration implying slit_play, and that suggestion has been pending for 5 years now, and I'm not really sure what i should do when that happens.

Don't necessarily agree with slit_vore implying slit_play (is oral_vore mouth_play?) but otherwise ๐Ÿ‘

Original page: https://e621.net/forum_topics/39393?page=1