Topic: [REJECTED] Somewhat Comprehensive Underwear implication BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #4725 has been rejected.

create implication light_jockstrap (12) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication light_jockstrap (12) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication dark_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication dark_jockstrap (0) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication pattern_jockstrap (4) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication pattern_jockstrap (4) -> pattern_underwear (7475)
create implication striped_jockstrap (11) -> pattern_jockstrap (4)
create implication striped_jockstrap (11) -> striped_underwear (5239)
create implication checkered_jockstrap (0) -> pattern_jockstrap (4)
create implication checkered_jockstrap (0) -> checkered_underwear (10)
create implication camo_jockstrap (5) -> pattern_jockstrap (4)
create implication camo_jockstrap (5) -> camo_underwear (82)
create implication spotted_jockstrap (0) -> pattern_jockstrap (4)
create implication spotted_jockstrap (0) -> spotted_underwear (134)
create implication rainbow_jockstrap (21) -> multicolored_jockstrap (170)
create implication rainbow_jockstrap (21) -> rainbow_underwear (144)
create implication pride_color_jockstrap (111) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication pride_color_jockstrap (111) -> pride_color_underwear (381)
create implication plaid_jockstrap (3) -> pattern_jockstrap (4)
create implication plaid_jockstrap (3) -> plaid_underwear (84)
create implication criss-cross_jockstrap (0) -> pattern_jockstrap (4)
create implication criss-cross_jockstrap (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)
create implication criss-cross_underwear (0) -> underwear (361251)
create implication criss-cross_underwear (0) -> criss-cross_clothing (28)

Reason: This will be a huge thread with many entries. This is an attempt at making comprehensive underwear tag implications so specialized tags will imply less specialized tags. One current implication is wrong so I will include the unimplication here (I believe it's two_tone_thong -> multicolored_thong)

EDIT: The bulk update request #4725 (forum #364468) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4726 has been rejected.

create implication criss-cross_bottomwear (2) -> bottomwear (406120)
create implication criss-cross_bottomwear (2) -> criss-cross_clothing (28)
create implication floral_jockstrap (0) -> floral_underwear (6)
create implication tight_jockstrap (22) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication tight_jockstrap (22) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication wet_jockstrap (14) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication wet_jockstrap (14) -> wet_underwear (3885)
create implication ineffective_jockstrap (4) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication ineffective_jockstrap (4) -> ineffective_underwear (64)
create implication skimpy_jockstrap (10) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication skimpy_jockstrap (10) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication torn_jockstrap (18) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication torn_jockstrap (18) -> torn_underwear (1010)
create implication flag_jockstrap (2) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication flag_jockstrap (2) -> flag_underwear (59)
create implication glistening_jockstrap (8) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication glistening_jockstrap (8) -> glistening_underwear (187)
create implication fishnet_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication fishnet_jockstrap (0) -> fishnet_underwear (249)
create implication jockstrap_down (175) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication jockstrap_down (175) -> underwear_down (25736)
create implication discarded_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication discarded_jockstrap (0) -> discarded_underwear (541)
create implication removing_jockstrap (4) -> jockstrap (18879)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4726 (forum #364469) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4727 has been rejected.

create implication removing_jockstrap (4) -> removing_underwear (136)
create implication glowing_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication glowing_jockstrap (0) -> glowing_underwear (0)
create implication glowing_underwear (0) -> underwear (361251)
create implication glowing_underwear (0) -> glowing_clothing (226)
create implication glowing_bottomwear (2) -> glowing_clothing (226)
create implication glowing_bottomwear (2) -> bottomwear (406120)
create implication dirty_jockstrap (44) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication dirty_jockstrap (44) -> dirty_underwear (177)
create implication dirty_underwear (177) -> underwear (361251)
create implication dirty_underwear (177) -> dirty_clothing (1063)
create implication dirty_bottomwear (19) -> dirty_clothing (1063)
create implication metal_jockstrap (0) -> metal_underwear (4)
create implication metal_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication metal_bottomwear (4) -> bottomwear (406120)
create implication metal_bottomwear (4) -> metal_clothing (20)
create implication adjusting_jockstrap (0) -> adjusting_underwear (4)
create implication adjusting_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication jockstrap_around_one_leg (0) -> underwear_around_one_leg (6297)
create implication jockstrap_around_one_leg (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_jockstrap (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_jockstrap (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_jockstrap (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_jockstrap (0) -> genital_fluids_through_underwear (0)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4727 (forum #364470) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4728 has been rejected.

create implication cum_through_jockstrap (276) -> genital_fluids_through_jockstrap (0)
create implication cum_through_jockstrap (276) -> cum_through_underwear (1586)
create implication precum_through_jockstrap (128) -> genital_fluids_through_jockstrap (0)
create implication precum_through_jockstrap (128) -> precum_through_underwear (1334)
create implication pussy_juice_through_jockstrap (0) -> genital_fluids_through_jockstrap (0)
create implication pussy_juice_through_jockstrap (0) -> pussy_juice_through_underwear (0)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_jockstrap (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_underwear (1)
create implication genital_fluids_on_jockstrap (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_jockstrap (0)
create implication genital_fluids_on_jockstrap (0) -> genital_fluids_on_underwear (0)
create implication cum_on_jockstrap (0) -> genital_fluids_on_jockstrap (0)
create implication cum_on_jockstrap (0) -> cum_on_underwear (257)
create implication precum_on_jockstrap (0) -> genital_fluids_on_jockstrap (0)
create implication precum_on_jockstrap (0) -> precum_on_underwear (17)
create implication pussy_juice_on_jockstrap (0) -> genital_fluids_on_jockstrap (0)
create implication pussy_juice_on_jockstrap (0) -> pussy_juice_on_underwear (0)
create implication light_briefs (20) -> briefs (17105)
create implication light_briefs (20) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication light_underwear (124) -> light_clothing (641)
create implication light_underwear (124) -> underwear (361251)
create implication dark_briefs (1) -> briefs (17105)
create implication dark_briefs (1) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication dark_underwear (147) -> dark_clothing (1010)
create implication dark_underwear (147) -> underwear (361251)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4728 (forum #364471) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4729 has been rejected.

create implication two_tone_briefs (264) -> briefs (17105)
create implication two_tone_briefs (264) -> two_tone_underwear (818)
create implication multicolored_briefs (100) -> briefs (17105)
create implication multicolored_briefs (100) -> multicolored_underwear (1465)
create implication glistening_briefs (6) -> glistening_underwear (187)
create implication glistening_briefs (6) -> briefs (17105)
create implication skimpy_briefs (14) -> briefs (17105)
create implication skimpy_briefs (14) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication wet_briefs (18) -> briefs (17105)
create implication wet_briefs (18) -> wet_underwear (3885)
create implication tight_briefs (40) -> briefs (17105)
create implication tight_briefs (40) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication ineffective_briefs (3) -> briefs (17105)
create implication ineffective_briefs (3) -> ineffective_underwear (64)
create implication dirty_briefs (4) -> briefs (17105)
create implication dirty_briefs (4) -> dirty_underwear (177)
create implication rainbow_briefs (8) -> multicolored_briefs (100)
create implication rainbow_briefs (8) -> rainbow_underwear (144)
create implication pattern_briefs (298) -> pattern_underwear (7475)
create implication pattern_briefs (298) -> briefs (17105)
create implication checkered_briefs (0) -> pattern_briefs (298)
create implication criss-cross_briefs (0) -> pattern_briefs (298)
create implication plaid_briefs (2) -> pattern_briefs (298)
create implication camo_briefs (0) -> pattern_briefs (298)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4729 (forum #364472) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4730 has been rejected.

create implication spotted_briefs (1) -> pattern_briefs (298)
create implication striped_briefs (117) -> pattern_briefs (298)
create implication floral_briefs (0) -> floral_underwear (6)
create implication floral_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication checkered_briefs (0) -> checkered_underwear (10)
create implication striped_briefs (117) -> striped_underwear (5239)
create implication criss-cross_briefs (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)
create implication plaid_briefs (2) -> plaid_underwear (84)
create implication spotted_briefs (1) -> spotted_underwear (134)
create implication camo_briefs (0) -> camo_underwear (82)
create implication text_on_briefs (62) -> text_on_underwear (1322)
create implication text_on_briefs (62) -> briefs (17105)
create implication fishnet_briefs (2) -> briefs (17105)
create implication fishnet_briefs (2) -> fishnet_underwear (249)
create implication drawstring_bottomwear (185) -> drawstring (1181)
create implication drawstring_underwear (3) -> drawstring (1181)
create implication drawstring_underwear (3) -> underwear (361251)
create implication drawstring_jockstrap (0) -> drawstring_underwear (3)
create implication drawstring_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication drawstring_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication drawstring_briefs (0) -> drawstring_underwear (3)
create implication adjusting_briefs (1) -> briefs (17105)
create implication adjusting_briefs (1) -> adjusting_underwear (4)
create implication briefs_down (197) -> briefs (17105)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4730 (forum #364473) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4731 has been rejected.

create implication briefs_down (197) -> underwear_down (25736)
create implication briefs_pull (160) -> briefs (17105)
create implication briefs_pull (160) -> underwear_pull (6544)
create implication discarded_briefs (36) -> briefs (17105)
create implication discarded_briefs (36) -> discarded_underwear (541)
create implication removing_briefs (27) -> briefs (17105)
create implication removing_briefs (27) -> removing_underwear (136)
create implication glowing_briefs (0) -> glowing_underwear (0)
create implication glowing_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication pride_color_briefs (25) -> multicolored_briefs (100)
create implication pride_color_briefs (25) -> pride_color_underwear (381)
create implication flag_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication flag_briefs (0) -> flag_underwear (59)
create implication metal_briefs (3) -> briefs (17105)
create implication metal_briefs (3) -> metal_underwear (4)
create implication briefs_around_one_leg (57) -> briefs (17105)
create implication briefs_around_one_leg (57) -> underwear_around_one_leg (6297)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_briefs (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication cum_through_briefs (4) -> genital_fluids_through_briefs (0)
create implication cum_through_briefs (4) -> cum_through_underwear (1586)
create implication precum_through_briefs (8) -> genital_fluids_through_briefs (0)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4731 (forum #364474) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4732 has been rejected.

create implication precum_through_briefs (8) -> precum_through_underwear (1334)
create implication pussy_juice_through_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_through_briefs (0)
create implication pussy_juice_through_briefs (0) -> pussy_juice_through_underwear (0)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_underwear (1)
create implication genital_fluids_on_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_briefs (0)
create implication genital_fluids_on_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_on_underwear (0)
create implication cum_on_briefs (3) -> genital_fluids_on_briefs (0)
create implication cum_on_briefs (3) -> cum_on_underwear (257)
create implication precum_on_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_on_briefs (0)
create implication precum_on_briefs (0) -> precum_on_underwear (17)
create implication pussy_juice_on_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_on_briefs (0)
create implication pussy_juice_on_briefs (0) -> pussy_juice_on_underwear (0)
create implication holding_briefs (28) -> briefs (17105)
create implication holding_briefs (28) -> holding_underwear (1786)
create implication holding_underwear (1786) -> underwear (361251)
create implication holding_underwear (1786) -> holding_clothing (5310)
create implication holding_jockstrap (40) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication holding_jockstrap (40) -> holding_underwear (1786)
create implication dark_thong (10) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication dark_thong (10) -> thong (36055)
create implication light_thong (29) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication light_thong (29) -> thong (36055)
remove implication two_tone_thong (38) -> multicolored_thong (128)

Reason: Additional BUR entries including unimply correction

EDIT: The bulk update request #4732 (forum #364475) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4733 has been rejected.

create implication wet_thong (10) -> thong (36055)
create implication wet_thong (10) -> wet_underwear (3885)
create implication tight_thong (54) -> thong (36055)
create implication tight_thong (54) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication skimpy_thong (46) -> thong (36055)
create implication skimpy_thong (46) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication gold_thong (11) -> gold_underwear (33)
create implication gold_thong (11) -> thong (36055)
create implication gold_jockstrap (3) -> gold_underwear (33)
create implication gold_jockstrap (3) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication gold_briefs (0) -> gold_underwear (33)
create implication gold_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication ineffective_thong (13) -> thong (36055)
create implication ineffective_thong (13) -> ineffective_underwear (64)
create implication pride_color_thong (63) -> thong (36055)
create implication pride_color_thong (63) -> pride_color_underwear (381)
create implication plaid_thong (0) -> plaid_underwear (84)
create implication plaid_thong (0) -> pattern_thong (26)
create implication camo_thong (5) -> camo_underwear (82)
create implication camo_thong (5) -> pattern_underwear (7475)
create implication checkered_thong (0) -> pattern_thong (26)
create implication checkered_thong (0) -> checkered_underwear (10)
create implication criss-cross_thong (0) -> pattern_thong (26)
create implication criss-cross_thong (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4733 (forum #364476) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4734 has been rejected.

create implication flag_thong (4) -> thong (36055)
create implication flag_thong (4) -> flag_underwear (59)
create implication dirty_thong (0) -> dirty_underwear (177)
create implication dirty_thong (0) -> thong (36055)
create implication torn_thong (6) -> torn_underwear (1010)
create implication torn_thong (6) -> thong (36055)
create implication text_on_thong (3) -> thong (36055)
create implication text_on_thong (3) -> text_on_underwear (1322)
create implication metal_thong (1) -> metal_underwear (4)
create implication metal_thong (1) -> thong (36055)
create implication glowing_thong (0) -> glowing_underwear (0)
create implication glowing_thong (0) -> thong (36055)
create implication fishnet_thong (10) -> fishnet_underwear (249)
create implication fishnet_thong (10) -> thong (36055)
create implication floral_thong (0) -> floral_underwear (6)
create implication floral_thong (0) -> thong (36055)
create implication thong_down (156) -> underwear_down (25736)
create implication thong_down (156) -> thong (36055)
create implication removing_thong (0) -> thong (36055)
create implication removing_thong (0) -> removing_underwear (136)
create implication discarded_thong (19) -> discarded_underwear (541)
create implication discarded_thong (19) -> thong (36055)
create implication thong_around_one_leg (2) -> thong (36055)
create implication thong_around_one_leg (2) -> underwear_around_one_leg (6297)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4734 (forum #364477) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4735 has been rejected.

create implication holding_thong (31) -> thong (36055)
create implication holding_thong (31) -> holding_underwear (1786)
create implication gradient_jockstrap (0) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication gradient_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication gradient_thong (0) -> thong (36055)
create implication gradient_thong (0) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication gradient_briefs (1) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication gradient_briefs (1) -> briefs (17105)
create implication metal_thong (1) -> metal_underwear (4)
create implication metal_thong (1) -> thong (36055)
create implication red_g-string (12) -> red_underwear (8580)
create implication red_g-string (12) -> g-string (1634)
create implication blue_g-string (2) -> g-string (1634)
create implication blue_g-string (2) -> blue_underwear (7066)
create implication green_g-string (3) -> g-string (1634)
create implication green_g-string (3) -> green_underwear (3227)
create implication orange_g-string (1) -> orange_underwear (1137)
create implication orange_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication yellow_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication yellow_g-string (1) -> yellow_underwear (1699)
create implication purple_g-string (1) -> purple_underwear (3759)
create implication purple_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication pink_g-string (4) -> g-string (1634)
create implication pink_g-string (4) -> pink_underwear (10142)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4735 (forum #364478) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4736 has been rejected.

create implication tan_g-string (1) -> tan_underwear (137)
create implication tan_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication brown_g-string (0) -> brown_underwear (388)
create implication brown_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication white_g-string (3) -> white_underwear (18189)
create implication white_g-string (3) -> g-string (1634)
create implication grey_g-string (0) -> grey_underwear (1370)
create implication grey_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication black_g-string (12) -> g-string (1634)
create implication black_g-string (12) -> black_underwear (15618)
create implication gold_g-string (0) -> gold_underwear (33)
create implication gold_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication two_tone_g-string (4) -> two_tone_underwear (818)
create implication two_tone_g-string (4) -> g-string (1634)
create implication multicolored_g-string (13) -> g-string (1634)
create implication multicolored_g-string (13) -> multicolored_underwear (1465)
create implication pattern_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication pattern_g-string (0) -> pattern_underwear (7475)
create implication print_g-string (1) -> print_underwear (2269)
create implication print_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication glistening_g-string (1) -> glistening_underwear (187)
create implication glistening_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication glowing_g-string (0) -> glowing_underwear (0)
create implication glowing_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4736 (forum #364479) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4737 has been rejected.

create implication wet_g-string (0) -> wet_underwear (3885)
create implication wet_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication skimpy_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication skimpy_g-string (1) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication tight_g-string (1) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication tight_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication metal_g-string (0) -> metal_underwear (4)
create implication metal_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication fishnet_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication fishnet_g-string (0) -> fishnet_underwear (249)
create implication leather_thong (31) -> leather_underwear (202)
create implication leather_thong (31) -> thong (36055)
create implication leather_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication leather_briefs (0) -> leather_underwear (202)
create implication leather_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication leather_g-string (0) -> leather_underwear (202)
create implication spiked_jockstrap (1) -> spiked_underwear (4)
create implication spiked_jockstrap (1) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication spiked_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication spiked_briefs (0) -> spiked_underwear (4)
create implication spiked_thong (5) -> spiked_underwear (4)
create implication spiked_thong (5) -> thong (36055)
create implication studded_briefs (0) -> studded_underwear (0)
create implication studded_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4737 (forum #364480) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4738 has been rejected.

create implication studded_thong (0) -> studded_underwear (0)
create implication studded_thong (0) -> thong (36055)
create implication studded_jockstrap (0) -> studded_underwear (0)
create implication studded_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication spiked_underwear (4) -> spiked_clothing (496)
create implication spiked_underwear (4) -> underwear (361251)
create implication spiked_bottomwear (2) -> spiked_clothing (496)
create implication spiked_bottomwear (2) -> bottomwear (406120)
create implication studded_underwear (0) -> underwear (361251)
create implication studded_underwear (0) -> studded_clothing (63)
create implication studded_bottomwear (0) -> studded_clothing (63)
create implication studded_bottomwear (0) -> bottomwear (406120)
create implication studded_clothing (63) -> clothing (2059954)
create implication studded_clothing (63) -> studs (2981)
create implication spiked_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication spiked_g-string (0) -> spiked_underwear (4)
create implication studded_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication studded_g-string (0) -> studded_underwear (0)
create implication rainbow_g-string (0) -> multicolored_g-string (13)
create implication rainbow_g-string (0) -> rainbow_underwear (144)
create implication pride_color_g-string (12) -> pride_color_underwear (381)
create implication pride_color_g-string (12) -> g-string (1634)
create implication camo_g-string (0) -> pattern_g-string (0)
create implication camo_g-string (0) -> camo_underwear (82)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4738 (forum #364481) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4739 has been rejected.

create implication checkered_g-string (0) -> pattern_g-string (0)
create implication checkered_g-string (0) -> checkered_underwear (10)
create implication striped_g-string (1) -> pattern_g-string (0)
create implication striped_g-string (1) -> striped_underwear (5239)
create implication spotted_g-string (0) -> pattern_g-string (0)
create implication spotted_g-string (0) -> pattern_g-string (0)
create implication plaid_g-string (0) -> plaid_underwear (84)
create implication plaid_g-string (0) -> pattern_g-string (0)
create implication criss-cross_g-string (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)
create implication criss-cross_g-string (0) -> pattern_g-string (0)
create implication holding_g-string (1) -> holding_underwear (1786)
create implication holding_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication discarded_g-string (1) -> discarded_underwear (541)
create implication discarded_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication g-string_down (6) -> g-string (1634)
create implication g-string_down (6) -> underwear_down (25736)
create implication g-string_aside (17) -> g-string (1634)
create implication g-string_aside (17) -> underwear_aside (15427)
create implication ineffective_g-string (0) -> ineffective_underwear (64)
create implication ineffective_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication g-string_around_one_leg (0) -> underwear_around_one_leg (6297)
create implication g-string_around_one_leg (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication g-string_pull (7) -> underwear_pull (6544)
create implication g-string_pull (7) -> g-string (1634)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4739 (forum #364482) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4740 has been rejected.

create implication torn_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication torn_g-string (0) -> torn_underwear (1010)
create implication dirty_g-string (0) -> dirty_underwear (177)
create implication dirty_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication glowing_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication glowing_g-string (0) -> glowing_underwear (0)
create implication floral_g-string (0) -> floral_underwear (6)
create implication floral_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication removing_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication removing_g-string (0) -> removing_underwear (136)
create implication text_on_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication text_on_g-string (0) -> text_on_underwear (1322)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_g-string (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_g-string (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_g-string (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication cum_through_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_through_g-string (0)
create implication cum_through_g-string (0) -> cum_through_underwear (1586)
create implication precum_through_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_through_g-string (0)
create implication precum_through_g-string (0) -> precum_through_underwear (1334)
create implication pussy_juice_through_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_through_g-string (0)
create implication pussy_juice_through_g-string (0) -> pussy_juice_through_underwear (0)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_g-string (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_underwear (1)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4740 (forum #364484) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4741 has been rejected.

create implication genital_fluids_on_g-string (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_g-string (0)
create implication genital_fluids_on_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_on_underwear (0)
create implication cum_on_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_on_g-string (0)
create implication cum_on_g-string (0) -> cum_on_underwear (257)
create implication precum_on_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_on_g-string (0)
create implication precum_on_g-string (0) -> precum_on_underwear (17)
create implication pussy_juice_on_g-string (0) -> genital_fluids_on_g-string (0)
create implication pussy_juice_on_g-string (0) -> pussy_juice_on_underwear (0)
create implication gold_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication gold_fundoshi (0) -> gold_underwear (33)
create implication two_tone_fundoshi (0) -> two_tone_underwear (818)
create implication fundoshi_down (6) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication fundoshi_down (6) -> underwear_down (25736)
create implication print_fundoshi (3) -> print_underwear (2269)
create implication print_fundoshi (3) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication pride_color_fundoshi (0) -> pride_color_underwear (381)
create implication pride_color_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication plaid_fundoshi (0) -> pattern_fundoshi (0)
create implication plaid_fundoshi (0) -> plaid_underwear (84)
create implication camo_fundoshi (0) -> camo_underwear (82)
create implication camo_fundoshi (0) -> pattern_fundoshi (0)
create implication criss-cross_fundoshi (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)
create implication criss-cross_fundoshi (0) -> pattern_fundoshi (0)
create implication gradient_fundoshi (0) -> gradient_underwear (5)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4741 (forum #364485) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4742 has been rejected.

create implication gradient_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication gradient_g-string (0) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication gradient_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication torn_fundoshi (1) -> torn_underwear (1010)
create implication torn_fundoshi (1) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication wet_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication wet_fundoshi (0) -> wet_underwear (3885)
create implication tight_fundoshi (10) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication tight_fundoshi (10) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication skimpy_fundoshi (7) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication skimpy_fundoshi (7) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication glistening_fundoshi (1) -> glistening_underwear (187)
create implication glistening_fundoshi (1) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication dirty_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication dirty_fundoshi (0) -> dirty_underwear (177)
create implication text_on_fundoshi (0) -> text_on_underwear (1322)
create implication text_on_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication holding_fundoshi (0) -> holding_underwear (1786)
create implication holding_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication fundoshi_pull (1) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication fundoshi_pull (1) -> underwear_pull (6544)
create implication discarded_fundoshi (0) -> discarded_underwear (541)
create implication discarded_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication removing_fundoshi (0) -> removing_underwear (136)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4742 (forum #364486) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4743 has been rejected.

create implication removing_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication floral_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication floral_fundoshi (0) -> floral_underwear (6)
create implication ineffective_fundoshi (0) -> ineffective_underwear (64)
create implication ineffective_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication flag_fundoshi (0) -> flag_underwear (59)
create implication flag_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication gradient_fundoshi (0) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication gradient_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication adjusting_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication adjusting_g-string (0) -> adjusting_underwear (4)
create implication adjusting_thong (2) -> adjusting_underwear (4)
create implication adjusting_thong (2) -> thong (36055)
create implication adjusting_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication adjusting_fundoshi (0) -> adjusting_underwear (4)
create implication fundoshi_around_one_leg (3) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication fundoshi_around_one_leg (3) -> underwear_around_one_leg (6297)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_fundoshi (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_fundoshi (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_fundoshi (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_fundoshi (0) -> genital_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication cum_through_fundoshi (6) -> genital_fluids_through_fundoshi (0)
create implication cum_through_fundoshi (6) -> cum_through_underwear (1586)
create implication precum_through_fundoshi (1) -> genital_fluids_through_fundoshi (0)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4743 (forum #364487) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4744 has been rejected.

create implication precum_through_fundoshi (1) -> precum_through_underwear (1334)
create implication pussy_juice_through_fundoshi (0) -> genital_fluids_through_fundoshi (0)
create implication pussy_juice_through_fundoshi (0) -> pussy_juice_through_underwear (0)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_fundoshi (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_underwear (1)
create implication genital_fluids_on_fundoshi (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_fundoshi (0)
create implication genital_fluids_on_fundoshi (0) -> genital_fluids_on_underwear (0)
create implication cum_on_fundoshi (0) -> genital_fluids_on_fundoshi (0)
create implication cum_on_fundoshi (0) -> cum_on_underwear (257)
create implication precum_on_fundoshi (0) -> genital_fluids_on_fundoshi (0)
create implication precum_on_fundoshi (0) -> precum_on_underwear (17)
create implication pussy_juice_on_fundoshi (0) -> genital_fluids_on_fundoshi (0)
create implication pussy_juice_on_fundoshi (0) -> pussy_juice_on_underwear (0)
create implication dark_fundoshi (0) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication dark_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication light_fundoshi (20) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication light_fundoshi (20) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication light_g-string (0) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication light_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication dark_g-string (1) -> g-string (1634)
create implication dark_g-string (1) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication two_tone_boxers (17) -> two_tone_underwear (818)
create implication two_tone_boxers (17) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication light_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4744 (forum #364488) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4745 has been rejected.

create implication light_boxers (0) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication dark_boxers (4) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication dark_boxers (4) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication rainbow_boxers (0) -> multicolored_boxers (7)
create implication rainbow_boxers (0) -> rainbow_underwear (144)
create implication pride_color_boxers (2) -> pride_color_underwear (381)
create implication pride_color_boxers (2) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication gradient_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication gradient_boxers (0) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication spotted_boxers (11) -> pattern_boxers (77)
create implication spotted_boxers (11) -> spotted_underwear (134)
create implication striped_boxers (46) -> pattern_boxers (77)
create implication striped_boxers (46) -> striped_underwear (5239)
create implication camo_boxers (5) -> pattern_boxers (77)
create implication camo_boxers (5) -> camo_underwear (82)
create implication plaid_boxers (6) -> plaid_underwear (84)
create implication plaid_boxers (6) -> pattern_boxers (77)
create implication checkered_boxers (2) -> pattern_boxers (77)
create implication checkered_boxers (2) -> checkered_underwear (10)
create implication flag_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication flag_boxers (0) -> flag_underwear (59)
create implication floral_boxers (0) -> floral_underwear (6)
create implication floral_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication glistening_boxers (0) -> glistening_underwear (187)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4745 (forum #364489) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4746 has been rejected.

create implication glistening_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication wet_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication wet_boxers (0) -> wet_underwear (3885)
create implication skimpy_boxers (0) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication skimpy_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication tight_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication tight_boxers (0) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication erection_under_boxers (0) -> erection_under_underwear (60)
create implication erection_under_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication erection_under_briefs (175) -> briefs (17105)
create implication erection_under_briefs (175) -> erection_under_underwear (60)
create implication erection_under_thong (3) -> erection_under_underwear (60)
create implication erection_under_thong (3) -> thong (36055)
create implication erection_under_fundoshi (0) -> fundoshi (10353)
create implication erection_under_fundoshi (0) -> erection_under_underwear (60)
create implication erection_under_g-string (0) -> g-string (1634)
create implication erection_under_g-string (0) -> erection_under_underwear (60)
create implication criss-cross_boxers (0) -> pattern_boxers (77)
create implication criss-cross_boxers (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)
create implication torn_boxers (6) -> torn_underwear (1010)
create implication torn_boxers (6) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication dirty_boxers (0) -> dirty_underwear (177)
create implication dirty_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication holding_boxers (5) -> holding_underwear (1786)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4746 (forum #364490) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4747 has been rejected.

create implication holding_boxers (5) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication discarded_boxers (7) -> discarded_underwear (541)
create implication discarded_boxers (7) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication boxers_aside (0) -> underwear_aside (15427)
create implication boxers_aside (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication boxers_down (94) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication boxers_down (94) -> underwear_down (25736)
create implication boxers_pull (0) -> underwear_pull (6544)
create implication boxers_pull (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication ineffective_boxers (0) -> ineffective_underwear (64)
create implication ineffective_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication drawstring_boxers (0) -> drawstring_underwear (3)
create implication drawstring_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication text_on_boxers (21) -> text_on_underwear (1322)
create implication text_on_boxers (21) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_boxers (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_boxers (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_boxers (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication cum_through_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_through_boxers (0)
create implication cum_through_boxers (0) -> cum_through_underwear (1586)
create implication precum_through_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_through_boxers (0)
create implication precum_through_boxers (0) -> precum_through_underwear (1334)
create implication pussy_juice_through_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_through_boxers (0)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4747 (forum #364491) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4748 has been rejected.

create implication pussy_juice_through_boxers (0) -> pussy_juice_through_underwear (0)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_boxers (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_underwear (1)
create implication genital_fluids_on_boxers (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_boxers (0)
create implication genital_fluids_on_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_on_underwear (0)
create implication cum_on_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_on_boxers (0)
create implication cum_on_boxers (0) -> cum_on_underwear (257)
create implication precum_on_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_on_boxers (0)
create implication precum_on_boxers (0) -> precum_on_underwear (17)
create implication pussy_juice_on_boxers (0) -> genital_fluids_on_boxers (0)
create implication pussy_juice_on_boxers (0) -> pussy_juice_on_underwear (0)
create implication tan_boxer_briefs (2) -> tan_underwear (137)
create implication tan_boxer_briefs (2) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication brown_boxer_briefs (7) -> brown_underwear (388)
create implication brown_boxer_briefs (7) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication light_boxer_briefs (0) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication light_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication dark_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication dark_boxer_briefs (0) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication two_tone_boxer_briefs (7) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication two_tone_boxer_briefs (7) -> two_tone_underwear (818)
create implication multicolored_boxer_briefs (19) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication multicolored_boxer_briefs (19) -> multicolored_underwear (1465)
create implication flag_boxer_briefs (0) -> flag_underwear (59)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4748 (forum #364492) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4749 has been rejected.

create implication flag_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication floral_boxer_briefs (0) -> floral_underwear (6)
create implication floral_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication wet_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication wet_boxer_briefs (0) -> wet_underwear (3885)
create implication tight_boxer_briefs (1) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication tight_boxer_briefs (1) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication skimpy_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication skimpy_boxer_briefs (0) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication glistening_boxer_briefs (1) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication glistening_boxer_briefs (1) -> glistening_underwear (187)
create implication torn_boxer_briefs (0) -> torn_underwear (1010)
create implication torn_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication ineffective_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication ineffective_boxer_briefs (0) -> ineffective_underwear (64)
create implication pattern_boxer_briefs (28) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication pattern_boxer_briefs (28) -> pattern_underwear (7475)
create implication criss-cross_boxer_briefs (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)
create implication criss-cross_boxer_briefs (0) -> pattern_boxer_briefs (28)
create implication striped_boxer_briefs (16) -> pattern_boxer_briefs (28)
create implication striped_boxer_briefs (16) -> striped_underwear (5239)
create implication spotted_boxer_briefs (3) -> spotted_underwear (134)
create implication spotted_boxer_briefs (3) -> pattern_boxer_briefs (28)
create implication plaid_boxer_briefs (0) -> pattern_boxer_briefs (28)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4749 (forum #364493) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4750 has been rejected.

create implication plaid_boxer_briefs (0) -> plaid_underwear (84)
create implication rainbow_boxer_briefs (0) -> rainbow_underwear (144)
create implication rainbow_boxer_briefs (0) -> multicolored_boxer_briefs (19)
create implication pride_color_boxer_briefs (16) -> pride_color_underwear (381)
create implication pride_color_boxer_briefs (16) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication camo_boxer_briefs (0) -> pattern_boxer_briefs (28)
create implication camo_boxer_briefs (0) -> camo_underwear (82)
create implication gradient_boxer_briefs (1) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication gradient_boxer_briefs (1) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication text_on_boxer_briefs (7) -> text_on_underwear (1322)
create implication text_on_boxer_briefs (7) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication removing_boxer_briefs (0) -> removing_underwear (136)
create implication removing_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication discarded_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication discarded_boxer_briefs (0) -> discarded_underwear (541)
create implication boxer_briefs_down (29) -> underwear_down (25736)
create implication boxer_briefs_down (29) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication boxer_briefs_aside (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication boxer_briefs_aside (0) -> underwear_aside (15427)
create implication boxer_briefs_pull (5) -> underwear_pull (6544)
create implication boxer_briefs_pull (5) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication erection_under_boxer_briefs (3) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication erection_under_boxer_briefs (3) -> erection_under_underwear (60)
create implication gold_boxer_briefs (0) -> gold_underwear (33)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4750 (forum #364494) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4751 has been rejected.

create implication gold_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication gold_boxers (0) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication gold_boxers (0) -> gold_underwear (33)
create implication holding_boxer_briefs (2) -> holding_underwear (1786)
create implication holding_boxer_briefs (2) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication open_boxers (17) -> open_underwear (57)
create implication open_boxers (17) -> boxers_(clothing) (7451)
create implication open_boxer_briefs (0) -> open_underwear (57)
create implication open_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication open_jockstrap (0) -> open_underwear (57)
create implication open_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (18879)
create implication open_briefs (0) -> open_underwear (57)
create implication open_briefs (0) -> briefs (17105)
create implication drawstring_boxer_briefs (0) -> drawstring_underwear (3)
create implication drawstring_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication boxer_briefs_around_one_leg (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication boxer_briefs_around_one_leg (0) -> underwear_around_one_leg (6297)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication cum_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0)
create implication cum_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> cum_through_underwear (1586)
create implication precum_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4751 (forum #364496) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4752 has been rejected.

create implication precum_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> precum_through_underwear (1334)
create implication pussy_juice_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_through_boxer_briefs (0)
create implication pussy_juice_through_boxer_briefs (0) -> pussy_juice_through_underwear (0)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> boxer_briefs (6313)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_underwear (1)
create implication genital_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0)
create implication genital_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_on_underwear (0)
create implication cum_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0)
create implication cum_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> cum_on_underwear (257)
create implication precum_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0)
create implication precum_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> precum_on_underwear (17)
create implication pussy_juice_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> genital_fluids_on_boxer_briefs (0)
create implication pussy_juice_on_boxer_briefs (0) -> pussy_juice_on_underwear (0)
create implication gold_panties (15) -> gold_underwear (33)
create implication gold_panties (15) -> panties (155682)
create implication light_panties (37) -> panties (155682)
create implication light_panties (37) -> light_underwear (124)
create implication dark_panties (44) -> dark_underwear (147)
create implication dark_panties (44) -> panties (155682)
create implication gradient_panties (2) -> gradient_underwear (5)
create implication gradient_panties (2) -> panties (155682)
create implication flag_panties (6) -> flag_underwear (59)
create implication flag_panties (6) -> panties (155682)
create implication criss-cross_panties (0) -> panties (155682)

Reason: additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4752 (forum #364497) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #4753 has been rejected.

create implication criss-cross_panties (0) -> criss-cross_underwear (0)
create implication tight_panties (187) -> panties (155682)
create implication tight_panties (187) -> tight_underwear (1049)
create implication skimpy_panties (0) -> skimpy_underwear (199)
create implication skimpy_panties (0) -> panties (155682)
create implication dirty_panties (12) -> dirty_underwear (177)
create implication dirty_panties (12) -> panties (155682)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_panties (0) -> panties (155682)
create implication bodily_fluids_through_panties (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_panties (0) -> bodily_fluids_through_panties (0)
create implication genital_fluids_through_panties (0) -> genital_fluids_through_underwear (0)
create implication cum_through_panties (0) -> genital_fluids_through_panties (0)
create implication cum_through_panties (0) -> cum_through_underwear (1586)
create implication precum_through_panties (0) -> genital_fluids_through_panties (0)
create implication precum_through_panties (0) -> precum_through_underwear (1334)
create implication pussy_juice_through_panties (0) -> genital_fluids_through_panties (0)
create implication pussy_juice_through_panties (0) -> pussy_juice_through_underwear (0)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_panties (0) -> panties (155682)
create implication bodily_fluids_on_panties (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_underwear (1)
create implication genital_fluids_on_panties (0) -> bodily_fluids_on_panties (0)
create implication genital_fluids_on_panties (0) -> genital_fluids_on_underwear (0)
create implication cum_on_panties (268) -> genital_fluids_on_panties (0)
create implication cum_on_panties (268) -> cum_on_underwear (257)
create implication precum_on_panties (0) -> genital_fluids_on_panties (0)

Reason: Additional BUR entries

EDIT: The bulk update request #4753 (forum #364498) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

Watsit

Privileged

There is a 25-entry limit per-BUR for a reason. Having things this big makes it that much harder to check for mistakes, both for us voting on it and admins accepting them. There is no reason to dump 30 BURs together, especially when a number of the BURs have more than half the tags unused. You could've at least separated underwear, jockstraps, panties, boxers, briefs, boxer-briefs, g-strings, fundoshi, thongs, into separate groups and done them one at a time. Discussing what you want to do first before making such a large BUR also helps ensure you don't do a lot of work for it, that ends up needing to be tossed and redone from scratch because of some underlying issue.

From what I see, I would remove the light_<object> and dark_<object> tags as they're too vague and subjective. Having to remove the implications to alias them away later will be extra unnecessary work. A number of others I'm not sure make sense, and others seem a bit too specific and can be aliased to more general tags. Like, is floral_g-string and text_on_g-string even possible? precum/cum/pussy_juice/genital_fluids/bodily_fluids_through/on_* for each type of underwear seems overly specific, searching for precum/cum/pussy_juice_on/through_underwear and the type of underwear would likely be good enough, 3x2=6 tags excluding the underwear type tag itself, without having to explode the number of tags to 5x2x9=90 excluding the underwear tag itself. This pattern could probably apply to most other things; instead of having text_on/floral/studded/pride-color for each individual type of underwear, just have them for *_underwear itself.

Updated

watsit said:
There is a 25-entry limit per-BUR for a reason. Having things this big makes it that much harder to check for mistakes, both for us voting on it and admins accepting them. There is no reason to dump 30 BURs together, especially when a number of the BURs have more than half the tags unused. You could've at least separated underwear, jockstraps, panties, boxers, briefs, boxer-briefs, g-strings, fundoshi, thongs, into separate groups and done them one at a time. Discussing what you want to do first before making such a large BUR also helps ensure you don't do a lot of work for it, that ends up needing to be tossed and redone from scratch because of some underlying issue.

From what I see, I would remove the light_<object> and dark_<object> tags as they're too vague and subjective. Having to remove the implications to alias them away later will be extra unnecessary work. A number of others I'm not sure make sense, and others seem a bit too specific and can be aliased to more general tags. Like, is floral_g-string and text_on_g-string even possible? precum/cum/pussy_juice/genital_fluids/bodily_fluids_through/on_* for each type of underwear seems overly specific, searching for precum/cum/pussy_juice_on/through_underwear and the type of underwear would likely be good enough, 3x2=6 tags excluding the underwear type tag itself, without having to explode the number of tags to 5x2x9=90 excluding the underwear tag itself. This pattern could probably apply to most other things; instead of having text_on/floral/studded/pride-color for each individual type of underwear, just have them for *_underwear itself.

Are we actually set on getting rid of light_ and dark_ tags? Personally, I find them useful. I remember people saying just not to go as far to tag light_[colour] or dark_[colour], and there are usually enough comparisons and context clues to be made to tag as such if there's a detailed setting or multiple characters or objects. short_ for instance isn't so ambiguous if a character is drinking from a pop can that is the size of their torso.

Watsit

Privileged

i'llkogyourmaw said:
Are we actually set on getting rid of light_ and dark_ tags? Personally, I find them useful. I remember people saying just not to go as far to tag light_[colour] or dark_[colour], and there are usually enough comparisons and context clues to be made to tag as such if there's a detailed setting or multiple characters or objects. short_ for instance isn't so ambiguous if a character is drinking from a pop can that is the size of their torso.

First off, I want to apologize if I came off somewhat snippy or rude. I guess I've been feeling a bit stressed for some reason and need to better recognize when to take a breather.

We're not set on getting rid of the light_ and dark_ tags, I don't think, but they are under scrutiny and might get the chop. For me, there's room for discussion on the light_[color] or dark_[color] tags; certain colors might be okay to have a light or dark variant if they're suitably distinguished and are useful enough to warrant a separate tag, and importantly can be kept under control (though I am skeptical many would be useful and not prone to mistags). While the light_[object] and dark_[object] tags I find have too much vagueness associated with them and are based too much on subjective perception. What someone may tag as dark_skin, for example, someone else may not consider to be dark (e.g. post #4041417 doesn't look dark at all to me, just slightly tanned; or post #4042615 which is a light grey or silvery shade, something I'd consider more light, not dark).

Jesus that was a lot
Speaking of which, why is jesus the only religious figure implying religion (either directly or indirectly), and why doesn't it imply christianity instead. Though I guess their presence in other religions does muddy the waters a bit

Updated

  • 1