Topic: [REJECTED] sexism tag implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

I'llKogYourMaw

Blocked

The bulk update request #4632 has been rejected.

create implication misogyny (104) -> sexism (61)
create implication philogyny (2) -> sexism (61)
create implication misandry (16) -> sexism (61)
create implication philandry (3) -> sexism (61)

Reason: The wiki page for sexism lists these four types, but none of them are set to imply sexism at the moment. sexist_slur also exists, but I think there might be niche cases, like ironic use, in which it might be used without sexism.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4632 (forum #363706) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

SNPtheCat

Member

i'llkogyourmaw said:
The bulk update request #4632 has been rejected.

create implication misogyny (104) -> sexism (61)
create implication philogyny (2) -> sexism (61)
create implication misandry (16) -> sexism (61)
create implication philandry (3) -> sexism (61)

Reason: The wiki page for sexism lists these four types, but none of them are set to imply sexism at the moment. sexist_slur also exists, but I think there might be niche cases, like ironic use, in which it might be used without sexism.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4632 (forum #363706) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Do we want to alias away these tags, keep misogyny and misandry, or do away with the sexism tag?

spe

Admin

I'm thinking we should keep them all. They would likely be useful for blacklisting.
It is worth noting that this user's pending BURs were just rejected en masse because there were a lot of them and they were mostly all garbage. This one seems reasonable, though. I think it would be safe to have Dash un-reject it.

  • 1