Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: faceless -> featureless_face

The tag implication #50505 faceless -> featureless_face has been rejected.

Reason: I think it makes sense that not having a face implicates not having features on the front side of the head or face

EDIT: The tag implication faceless -> featureless_face (forum #362754) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Seems like this should be an alias. The faceless wiki says "Characters with a head but with a featureless face."

watsit said:
Seems like this should be an alias. The faceless wiki says "Characters with a head but with a featureless face."

I wondered if there was a difference. I agree that an alias may have been a better choice, it was late when I made the suggestion.

The tag implication faceless -> featureless_face (forum #362754) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4880 is pending approval.

create alias faceless (1590) -> featureless_face (1475) # duplicate of has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur

Reason: See above

The bulk update request #4881 is pending approval.

remove alias no_face (0) -> faceless (1590)

Reason: Blocking intransitive.

See also: topic #38675
tl;dr: Faceless is being used both for featureless_face and when the face is simply off-screen (faceless_character). Obscured_face is similarly problematic.