Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #61933 graphite -> graphite_(artwork) has been rejected.
Reason: The graphite tag is currently used for artworks made with graphite pencil. It’s pretty much the same as graphite_(artwork)
EDIT: The tag alias graphite -> graphite_(artwork) (forum #362281) has been rejected by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
Why not reverse it then?
wat8548 said:
Why not reverse it then?
Because graphite can refer to a few other things, including an artist.
clawstripe said:
Because graphite can refer to a few other things, including an artist.
Shouldn't it be disambiguated, then? If it's ambiguous enough to need a suffix, it's ambiguous enough to not be aliased to a specific use.
watsit said:
Shouldn't it be disambiguated, then? If it's ambiguous enough to need a suffix, it's ambiguous enough to not be aliased to a specific use.
That might be a good idea. I did consider that possibility when I posted the above.
The tag alias graphite -> graphite_(artwork) (forum #362281) has been rejected by @slyroon.
The bulk update request #9543 is pending approval.
create alias graphite (3) -> graphite_(disambiguation) (0)
change category graphite_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
Reason: graphite*
Im surprised there is no graphite_(object)
