The bulk update request #4317 has been rejected.
remove implication puss_in_boots_(dreamworks) (2468) -> dreamworks (29167)
mass update puss_in_boots_(dreamworks) -> puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_character)
mass update puss_in_boots_(film) -> puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_series)
create implication puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_series) (0) -> dreamworks (29167)
create implication the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots (0) -> puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_series) (0)
create implication puss_in_boots_the_last_wish (1) -> puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_series) (0)
create implication puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_character) (0) -> puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_series) (0)
create implication kitty_softpaws (533) -> puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_series) (0)
create implication perrito_(puss_in_boots) (236) -> puss_in_boots_(dreamworks_series) (0)
create implication death_(puss_in_boots) (5337) -> puss_in_boots_the_last_wish (1)
create implication dulcinea_(puss_in_boots) (80) -> the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots (0)
create implication pajuna_(puss_in_boots) (5) -> the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots (0)
create implication sheila_(puss_in_boots) (12) -> the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots (0)
create implication sphinx_(puss_in_boots) (8) -> the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots (0)
Reason: Something needs to be done about this, but honestly I don't like the current proposals very much, including my own.
- puss_in_boots_(character), puss_in_boots_(series), puss_in_boots_(film) and puss_in_boots_(dreamworks) are all ambiguous, but the fixed suffix looks so clumsy... I'm tired
- Perrito will probably appear in the next film, Death is unlikely, I guess the characters from TAOPIB should be safe to imply... decisions, decisions
Previous proposals:
EDIT: The bulk update request #4317 (forum #359577) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.
Updated by auto moderator