Topic: [APPROVED] wedgie bur

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #4256 is active.

create implication atomic_wedgie (158) -> wedgie (1795)
create alias underwear_pulled_down (0) -> underwear_down (25740)
create alias pulling_underwear_down (0) -> underwear_down (25740)
create alias pulling_down_underwear (0) -> underwear_down (25740)

Reason: Should be self-explanatory.

Edit: I added a few redundant tags to alias too, so I didn't need to create another bur for that.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4256 (forum #358778) has been approved by @furrypickle.

Updated by auto moderator

This would make sense if it was being used by the traditional definition. But some of those 'wedgie' posts are just 'bottomwear in the buttcrack' posts instead of anything actually pulling on them. Also, it isn't always underwear.

So for now, I'm going to remove:
create implication wedgie (1202) -> underwear_pull (4584)

from out of the BUR.

-

atomic_wedgie is a type of extreme wedgie though, so that one looks good.

The various underwear pulling tags were a mixture of some that were underwear_down, some that were underwear_pull and some that were both. But they don't seem to be used that often, so I think once they are gone and not being suggested, then people will naturally be redirected to the proper tags for those things instead. So I tagged out the stuff that seemed better described as underwear_pull, and then approved those.

  • 1