Right now we have stop_piercing aliased to bridge_piercing and implying furry-specific_piercing (check forum #149090).

Technically humans can have bridge_piercings (just check here) so if both tags are considered the same, this implication is nonsensical.

I'm glad you caught that. Implication from stop_piercing to --> furry-specific_piercing is deleted. I'm honestly baffled why it was considered a furry-specific piercing at all. Usually those are reserved for pierced anatomy humans don't even have. But pierced bridge of the nose is pretty much the same thing regardless of it's a human nose or a snout, it's still recognizably the same area.

Normally I remember to check for existing implications that need moved over or changed, but sometimes they get missed because they're not easy to check for in that screen. In future, you can just dmail me if you notice a missed implication like this one. Though in this case, it looks like the older implication just needed deleted.