Topic: Tag Alias: in_bed -> on_bed

Aliasing in_bed → on_bed
Link to alias

Reason:

Same.

Related implication:

• your_mother -> on_bed

[/badjokeday]

Well technically I think in_bed is supposed to be for images like this:

post #427589 post #363632 post #361733 post #413147 post #316603 post #332397 post #132306 post #142119 post #285388

Where the covers are pulled up over them instead of just being on top of the bed. And, as far as I can tell, this usage doesn't seem to be covered by any other tag (no pun intended). So would a cleanup and implication work better?

furrypickle said:
Well technically I think in_bed is supposed to be for images like this:

post #427589 post #363632 post #361733 post #413147 post #316603 post #332397 post #132306 post #142119 post #285388

Where the covers are pulled up over them instead of just being on top of the bed. And, as far as I can tell, this usage doesn't seem to be covered by any other tag (no pun intended). So would a cleanup and implication work better?

under_covers sounds like what it should be, kind of strange that the tag doesn't exist.

Furrin_Gok said:
under_covers sounds like what it should be, kind of strange that the tag doesn't exist.

Under_covers would be a lot less ambiguous or likely to mistag, so I think that would be an improvement. I think manually moving them over might be better than trying to keep in_bed and on_bed distinct in usage. Then we can alias away in_bed to somewhere.

Would people agree with that?

That seems like a logical way to go. +1 to under_covers.

Alias in_bed to under_covers, then implicate it to on_bed? That way there wouldn't be much clean up, we'd just need to untag under_covers from the ones that don't belong under that tag.

Alright, sounds like a plan. So I've cleaned up the tag in_bed and then aliased it to --> under_covers which should help clarify the usage. *knock on wood*

And then implicated under_covers to --> on_bed.