The bulk update request #3994 is active.

remove implication nantaimori (7) -> nyotaimori (9)

Reason: If Nantaimori is the male version, why is the female one implied? Alternatively, we could invalidate it and just have the one tag and say it’s non gender specific

EDIT: The bulk update request #3994 (forum #355833) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Perhaps we could alias both terms to body_sushi, which would be a little bit more understandable as a tag.

clawstripe said:
Perhaps we could alias both terms to body_sushi, which would be a little bit more understandable as a tag.

Yeah, sounds good to me

The bulk update request #3994 (forum #355833) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4000 is active.

remove implication nyotaimori (9) -> food_play (7232)
remove alias body_sushi (317) -> nyotaimori (9)

Reason: To continue with the above and alias both terms to the gender-neutral body_sushi, which can then also cover when intersex and ambiguous characters are involved with the accompanying food_play implication. Furthermore, body sushi is hopefully a little bit more understandable to us silly English-speakers than either "nyotaimori" or "nantaimori". (There's nothing wrong with the words, just as there's nothing wrong with ursid, even though we use bear to better communicate what we're talking about to the average user.)

alias nyotaimori -> body_sushi
alias nantaimori -> body_sushi
imply body_sushi -> food_play

EDIT: The bulk update request #4000 (forum #355919) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4000 (forum #355919) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4002 is active.

create alias nyotaimori (9) -> body_sushi (317)
create alias nantaimori (7) -> body_sushi (317)
create implication body_sushi (317) -> food_play (7232)

Reason: The follow-up BUR.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4002 (forum #355989) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #4002 (forum #355989) has been approved by @slyroon.