The bulk update request #3784 is active.

create alias singe_(character) (0) -> singe_(disambiguation) (0)
create implication singe_(dragon's_lair) (28) -> dragon's_lair (66)
create implication dirk_the_daring (13) -> dragon's_lair (66)
create implication princess_daphne (41) -> dragon's_lair (66)
create implication dragon's_lair (66) -> don_bluth (2748)

Reason: Someone could conceivably name their own character Singe.

The characters are Dragon's Lair characters, making the implications straightforward.

Don Bluth did the animation for Dragon's Lair.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3784 (forum #353326) has been approved by @slyroon.

vulpes_artifex said:
Reason: Someone could conceivably name their own character Singe, so the alias is future-proofing.

Then it should be disambiguated, otherwise the one character is still taking the generic tag for themself. There's no point aliasing an ambiguous character tag to a less ambiguous one if people are going to use it for other characters, it will cause mistags.

watsit said:
Then it should be disambiguated, otherwise the one character is still taking the generic tag for themself. There's no point aliasing an ambiguous character tag to a less ambiguous one if people are going to use it for other characters, it will cause mistags.

Changed.

I also just went through singe_(character) and re-tagged all the posts singe_(dragon's_lair).

The bulk update request #3784 (forum #353326) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6899 is active.

create alias singe (11) -> singe_(disambiguation) (0)
change category singe_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid

Reason: Ambiguous, and apparently it's been made a character tag.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6899 (forum #393542) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6899 (forum #393542) has been approved by @slyroon.