[ta:59067]

Reason: these tags describe the same thing

EDIT: The tag alias cow_print_bikini -> cow_bikini (forum #347108) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Perhaps the other way around would have been more descriptive and verbose? Though that will show both either way, so eh

well, on one hand, i think cow_print_bikini is more natural...
... on the other hand cow_bikini has more posts

The reverse sounds better to me

+1 to reversing the alias. Cow print sounds nicer, and cow_bikini is slightly ambiguous, potentially suggesting a cow wearing a normal bikini, a bikini with a cow's face on it, or a bikini with the text "cow" on it.

The tag alias cow_print_bikini -> cow_bikini (forum #347108) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

animal bikini said:
The following tags implicate this tag: cow_bikini, zebra_bikini, jaguar_bikini, tiger_bikini (learn more).

If you want to reverse this alias then please write a BUR and fix relationships for the rest of the bikinis as well

The bulk update request #4001 is active.

remove implication cow_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication jaguar_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication tiger_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication zebra_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication animal_bikini (0) -> bikini (79335)
remove implication animal_bikini (0) -> animal_print (8254)
remove implication animal_bikini (0) -> pattern_swimwear (2761)
remove implication cow_bikini (0) -> cow_print (6612)
remove implication jaguar_bikini (0) -> jaguar_print (42)
remove implication tiger_bikini (0) -> tiger_print (382)
remove implication zebra_bikini (0) -> zebra_print (172)
remove alias cow_print_bikini (1542) -> cow_bikini (0)
remove alias cowkini (0) -> cow_bikini (0)

Reason:

gattonero2001 said:
If you want to reverse this alias then please write a BUR and fix relationships for the rest of the bikinis as well

Like so?

Follow-up BUR:

alias animal_bikini -> animal_print_bikini
alias cow_bikini -> cow_print_bikini
alias cowkini -> cow_print_bikini
alias jaguar_bikini -> leopard_print_bikini
alias leopard_bikini -> leopard_print_bikini
alias tiger_bikini -> tiger_print_bikini
alias zebra_bikini -> zebra_print_bikini
imply animal_print_bikini -> animal_print
imply cow_print_bikini -> cow_print
imply leopard_print_bikini -> leopard_print
imply tiger_print_bikini -> tiger_print
imply zebra_print_bikini -> zebra_print
imply cow_print_bikini -> animal_print_bikini
imply leopard_print_bikini -> animal_print_bikini
imply tiger_print_bikini -> animal_print_bikini
imply zebra_print_bikini -> animal_print_bikini
imply animal_print_bikini -> bikini
imply animal_print_bikini -> pattern_swimwear

Did I get them right? This aliases all these animal bikinis (and animal_bikini) to the respective animal print bikinis, implies the new bikini tags to the respective animal prints, implies the animal print bikinis to animal_print_bikini, animal_print_bikini to animal_bikini's former implications, and converts the empty jaguar_bikini to leopard_print_bikini.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4001 (forum #355988) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

clawstripe said:
The bulk update request #4001 is active.

remove implication cow_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication jaguar_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication tiger_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication zebra_bikini (0) -> animal_bikini (0)
remove implication animal_bikini (0) -> bikini (79335)
remove implication animal_bikini (0) -> animal_print (8254)
remove implication animal_bikini (0) -> pattern_swimwear (2761)
remove implication cow_bikini (0) -> cow_print (6612)
remove implication jaguar_bikini (0) -> jaguar_print (42)
remove implication tiger_bikini (0) -> tiger_print (382)
remove implication zebra_bikini (0) -> zebra_print (172)
remove alias cow_print_bikini (1542) -> cow_bikini (0)
remove alias cowkini (0) -> cow_bikini (0)

+1 for a clearer set of tag names.

The bulk update request #4001 (forum #355988) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

clawstripe said:
alias jaguar_bikini -> leopard_print_bikini

Jaguar print and leopard print are visually distinct. Even though it is empty now, it could be populated later.

gattonero2001 said:
Jaguar print and leopard print are visually distinct. Even though it is empty now, it could be populated later.

That's what I thought, when rosettes got aliased to leopard_spots some time ago, despite not being exclusive or unique to leopards.

gattonero2001 said:
Jaguar print and leopard print are visually distinct. Even though it is empty now, it could be populated later.

Can do. I know that leopard, cheetah, and jaguar spots are all visually distinct, but I wasn't sure that artistic depictions would always distinguish them too well. I think some artists go for a more polka dotted spot pattern and call it a day rather than actually make the spots look right for the species. Maybe jaguar_print and leopard_print should both be aliased to rosette_print. I don't know. :\

The bulk update request #4014 is active.

Reason: As above, but keeps leopard_print_bikini and jaguar_print_bikini separate.

EDIT: Animal_print_bikini now implicates bikini and pattern_swimwear through pattern_bikini instead of directly.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4014 (forum #356067) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

clawstripe said:
create implication animal_print_bikini (1) -> bikini (57071)
create implication animal_print_bikini (1) -> pattern_swimwear (1457)

Why not just imply to pattern bikini?

gattonero2001 said:
Why not just imply to pattern bikini?

Because I didn't know that was a thing before. Thanks.

The bulk update request #4014 (forum #356067) has been approved by @gattonero2001.