The bulk update request #3327 is pending approval.

create implication striped_fur (44480) -> fur_markings (21001)
create implication spotted_fur (42810) -> fur_markings (21001)
create implication striped_scales (1673) -> scale_markings (1101)
create implication spotted_scales (1445) -> scale_markings (1101)
create implication striped_feathers (495) -> feather_markings (331)
create implication spotted_feathers (340) -> feather_markings (331)
create implication striped_exoskeleton (65) -> exoskeleton_markings (49)
create implication spotted_exoskeleton (109) -> exoskeleton_markings (49)
create implication exoskeleton_markings (49) -> exoskeleton (4404)
create implication exoskeleton_markings (49) -> markings (406728)
remove implication striped_body (58872) -> stripes (175828)
create implication striped_body (58872) -> striped_markings (41230)
remove implication spotted_body (53495) -> spots (94797)
create implication spotted_body (53495) -> spotted_markings (10900)

Reason: stripes and spots are markings (except i know what i’m doing this time) (hopefully)

This seems to me like an improvement over the existing organisation.

For consistency, I'd also suggest adding to this BUR:

create implication striped_exoskeleton (57) -> exoskeleton_markings (8)
create implication spotted_exoskeleton (85) -> exoskeleton_markings (8)
create implication exoskeleton_markings (8) -> markings (198399)
create implication exoskeleton_markings (8) -> exoskeleton (2497)

added!

say, what’s the difference between striped_body and striped_markings anyway? should they be merged?

cheshire3rd said:
added!

Fantastic!

cheshire3rd said:
say, what’s the difference between striped_body and striped_markings anyway? should they be merged?

The two would be identical 99.99% of the time, I imagine. However, images like post #3160292 would be an exception. This post depicts the painting of striped_markings with bodypaint, while the character -- a lion -- does not herself possess a striped_body. The whole thrust of the image is that she does not have a striped body and is thus painting on striped markings.

EDIT: One additional (though hypothetical) counter-example would be an animal-skin rug or a fur coat from a striped animal. The rug/coat is no longer a body, and thus should not be tagged as a striped body, but the object still possesses the striped markings of the animal from which the object has been produced.