Topic: Tag Implication: (many) -> intersex_on_intersex

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Implicating (many) → intersex_on_intersex
Link to implication

Reason:

List of concerned tags:

herm_on_herm, herm_on_dickgirl, herm_on_cuntboy, dickgirl_on_dickgirl, dickgirl_on_cuntboy, cuntboy_on_cuntboy

Reason:

As we have intersex as a mother tag for dickgirl herm and cuntboy, I suggest to do the same for the X_on_Y tags.

Updated by furrypickle

Functionally this already happens. Because all gender_on_gender tags already have implications to the gender tags within them, and the intersex gender tags already implicate intersex ...so this wouldn't be needed.

So for example, dickgirl_on_herm already implicates dickgirl and herm tags, and since both herm and dickgirl already implicate intersex then the intersex tag will already be added to the image. It's in the implication chain already.

See the discussion below.

Updated by anonymous

furrypickle said:

Functionally this already happens. Because all gender_on_gender tags already have implications to gender tags in them, and the intersex genders already implicate intersex ...so this wouldn't be needed.

So for example, dickgirl_on_herm already implicates dickgirl and herm tags, and since both herm and dickgirl already implicate intersex then the intersex tag will already be added to the image. It's in the implication chain already.

I don't know about that. It would be nice to be able to type in "Intersex_on_Intersex" and have exactly that come up.
But if you're saying we have a system in place already that would allow that, then I suppose everything's fine how it is.

Updated by anonymous

Phantom_Janitor said:
I don't know about that. It would be nice to be able to type in "Intersex_on_Intersex" and have exactly that come up.
But if you're saying we have a system in place already that would allow that, then I suppose everything's fine how it is.

Oh ok, I see what you're saying now. I misunderstood at first and thought this was talking about implicating say dickgirl_on_herm to --> intersex.

But you're both suggesting making a new tag called intersex_on_intersex for implicating all the tags that have an intersex gender on another intersex gender sex going on. That's an interesting idea. As far as I know we don't have anything like that but I could see how it'd make some kinds of searches easier and some kinds of blacklisting more simplified.

So it would go something like this? (implicating):
herm_on_herm -> intersex_on_intersex
dickgirl_on_herm -> intersex_on_intersex

dickgirl_on_dickgirl -> intersex_on_intersex

herm_on_cuntboy --> intersex_on_intersex
dickgirl_on_cuntboy -> intersex_on_intersex
cuntboy_on_cuntboy -> intersex_on_intersex

I'd be fine with doing this. Otherwise trying to search all of these at once would be functionally impossible.

Updated by anonymous

Yeah, I'm ok with this idea too. It's honestly a tag I never even knew I was missing, but once it comes into effect I think it'll likely become something I commonly search for.

Updated by anonymous

Sounds great
I was wondering about this for a while, since we have the gay,lesbian, and straight tags already

Updated by anonymous

Alright, approved all of these:

(implicating):
herm_on_herm -> intersex_on_intersex
dickgirl_on_herm -> intersex_on_intersex

dickgirl_on_dickgirl -> intersex_on_intersex

herm_on_cuntboy --> intersex_on_intersex
dickgirl_on_cuntboy -> intersex_on_intersex
cuntboy_on_cuntboy -> intersex_on_intersex

Including ones for maleherm which tends to be undertagged but would probably be good to have in there.

parasprite said:
A thought...

intersex_on_male
intersex_on_female

They would need all the implications as well, but it may be worth considering, possibly holding out to see how well the tags above work.

Also approved the implications to these (herm_on_male implicated to intersex_on_male etc) -->. (for future reference, forum #148489 is minorly related to this thread.)

Updated by anonymous

  • 1