Topic: [APPROVED] Bad Dragon BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2979 is active.

create implication alice_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication anthro_dragon_(bad_dragon) (3) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication anthro_shark_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication apollo_(bad_dragon) (9) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication austin_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication axel_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication baron_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication bishop_(bad_dragon) (5) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication blaze_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication bruce_(bad_dragon) (4) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication bruiser_(bad_dragon) (9) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication chance_(bad_dragon) (88) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication clayton_(bad_dragon) (11) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication clint_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication cockatrice_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication cole_(bad_dragon) (3) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication crackers_(bad_dragon) (66) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication david_(bad_dragon) (15) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication demon_dick_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication dexter_(bad_dragon) (4) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication dragon's_tongue_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication duke_(bad_dragon) (78) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication echo_(bad_dragon) (11) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication egg_plug_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication fenrir_(bad_dragon) (12) -> bad_dragon (1720)

Reason: Characters that belong to and products that are sold by Bad Dragon

EDIT: The bulk update request #2979 (forum #341434) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #2980 is active.

create implication flint_(bad_dragon) (39) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication glyph_(bad_dragon) (10) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication gryphon_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication guardian_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication hanns_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication hazel_(bad_dragon) (5) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication helius_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication janine_(bad_dragon) (42) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication jt_(bad_dragon) (3) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication kelvin_(bad_dragon) (23) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication kona_(bad_dragon) (10) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication lily_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication mary_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication meng_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication mountain_drake_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication natascha_(bad_dragon) (0) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication nix_(bad_dragon) (4) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication nocturne_(bad_dragon) (9) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication nova_(bad_dragon) (24) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication nox_(bad_dragon) (30) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication orochi_(bad_dragon) (5) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication perry_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication pretzal_(bad_dragon) (11) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication razor_(bad_dragon) (3) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication rex_(bad_dragon) (47) -> bad_dragon (1720)

Reason: Characters that belong to and products that are sold by Bad Dragon

EDIT: The bulk update request #2980 (forum #341435) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #2981 is active.

create implication ridley_(bad_dragon) (3) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication roland_(bad_dragon) (4) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication rowan_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication scorn_(bad_dragon) (3) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication sleipnir_(bad_dragon) (5) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication snep_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication sofia_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication spitfire_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication spritz_(bad_dragon) (16) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication stan_(bad_dragon) (21) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication stubbs_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication sveinn_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication tailstretcher_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication tako_(bad_dragon) (6) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication tentacle_(bad_dragon) (6) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication terra_(bad_dragon) (5) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication trent_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication tucker_(bad_dragon) (4) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication twitch_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication vasu_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication vergil_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication winston_(bad_dragon) (2) -> bad_dragon (1720)
create implication xar_(bad_dragon) (1) -> bad_dragon (1720)

Reason: Characters that belong to and products that are sold by Bad Dragon

EDIT: The bulk update request #2981 (forum #341436) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

fifteen said:
How is one meant to make the distinction between the dildo and the character? Most are used to designate the dildos (especially those without character names like anthro_dragon_(bad_dragon)) but the mascots like duke_(bad_dragon) and janine (bad dragon) are more used for characters. Should there be separate suffixes for these?

Good questions.
This subject is also at topic #19810 , discussion ceased there three years ago ... probably because too many tags were involved.
(this time probably better to break up workload into smaller steps to make more manageable)

First step: looking at existing *bad_dragon* tags:
https://e621.net/tags?commit=Search&search%5Bhide_empty%5D=1&search%5Bname_matches%5D=%2Abad_dragon%2A&search%5Border%5D=name

we have
bad_dragon_dildo, with 143 posts
and
dildo_(bad_dragon) with 17 posts.

EDIT: Of the two, I think dildo_(bad_dragon) seems like the better tag.

Updated

The bulk update request #3519 is active.

create alias bad_dragon_dildo (2) -> dildo_(bad_dragon) (213)

Reason: 2 tags for same thing.

I think dildo_(bad_dragon) seems slightly better as tag,
(bad_dragon_dildo has potential of being mis-interpreted as a bad dildo that is shaped like dragon-penis???)

(edit: alternative is to manually change tag for dildos confirmed to be Bad Dragon dildos to dildo_(bad_dragon) ?)

EDIT: The bulk update request #3519 (forum #349393) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1