The bulk update request #2973 has been rejected.
create alias bicorn (190) -> duocorn (2)
create implication duocorn (2) -> horn (664998)
create implication duocorn (2) -> equid (417524)
create implication duocorn (2) -> equine (399328)
Reason: The unicorn wiki mentions several other similiar but distinct species tags of mythical creatures that have one or two horns on their head, and even mentions the narwhal and rhinoceros. All of the similar species are different enough to warrant their own tag, although duocorns are essentially just the exact same as unicorns except with two horns instead of one. I'm unsure as to whether or not that's different enough to warrant their own tag, but I would think so since the number of horns a unicorn has is literally in it's name.
If we're going to have a separate tag for a two horned unicorn variant, then it needs to have 1 tag instead of multiple. Even though there are 111 posts under bicorn and the tag duocorn only has 12 posts, I'd consider duocorn being the better tag for consistency's sake, since the prefix uni- is latin for one, and the prefix du- or duo- is latin for two. Additionally, we should give this tag the unicorn treatment, by implying horn, equid, and equine.
EDIT: The bulk update request #2973 (forum #341284) has been rejected by @TrevorTheYeen.
Updated by auto moderator