The bulk update request #2812 has been rejected.

change category pokémorph (0) -> species
remove implication pokémorph (0) -> pokémon (0)
remove implication pokémon_humanoid (0) -> pokémon (0)
create implication pokémorph (0) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
change category digimorph (686) -> species
create implication digimon_humanoid (26) -> digimorph (686)
create implication digimon_humanoid (26) -> humanoid (457427)

Reason: more accurate and simplified implication structure

pokémon_humanoid -> pokémorph -> pokémon_(species)

pokémon_humanoid -> humanoid

digimon_humanoid -> digimorph -> digimon_(species)

digimon_humanoid -> humanoid

EDIT: The bulk update request #2812 (forum #339539) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

IIRC, Pokemorph is for anthrofied pokemon, which is different from a pokemon_humanoid (humanoidized pokemon). I presume it's the same for digimon. And since it specifies the form of the character, digi/pokemorph shouldn't be a species tag.

watsit said:
IIRC, Pokemorph is for anthrofied pokemon, which is different from a pokemon_humanoid (humanoidized pokemon).

pokémon humanoid already implies pokémorph

gattonero2001 said:
pokémon humanoid already implies pokémorph

Without any discussion, and I'll let you guess who did it. I don't think that implication is valid, given that digimorph doesn't have that implication, and we should keep humanoidized and anthrofied tags separate.

watsit said:
Without any discussion, and I'll let you guess who did it. I don't think that implication is valid, given that digimorph doesn't have that implication, and we should keep humanoidized and anthrofied tags separate.

Whether any previously existing implications were valid or not is out of the scope of this BUR. I'll leave the question as an exercise for the approver.

I would also prefer pokémon_humanoid and pokémorph to imply pokémon_(species) separately, and not each other.

Digimorph and pokémorph shouldn't be turned into species tags, since they're equivalent to humanoidized and anthrofied which aren't species. It's just noting they're depicted with an altered form, they're not their own species.

The bulk update request #2812 (forum #339539) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3996 is active.

remove implication pokemon_humanoid (1267) -> pokemorph (66138)
create implication pokemon_humanoid (1267) -> pokemon_(species) (518767)
create implication digimon_humanoid (26) -> digimon_(species) (60718)

Reason: Well, since I was reminded about it, might as well give this a go. pokemorph and pokemon_humanoid are distinct concepts that shouldn't be conflated. The existing implication is equivalent to having animal_humanoid imply anthro.

While checking I noticed that digimon_humanoid doesn't have any implications yet.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3996 (forum #355897) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3996 (forum #355897) has been approved by @gattonero2001.