Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: tail_tufts -> tail_tuft

Member

Reason: To make it more inline with other tags.

EDIT: The tag implication tail_tufts -> tail_tuft (forum #339247) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator over 3 years ago

Privileged

You may have meant an alias, instead of an implication.

Member

Alias replaces, implication adds the second while keeping the first.

Janitor

The tag implication tail_tufts -> tail_tuft (forum #339247) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Member

watsit said:
You may have meant an alias, instead of an implication.

I did. Seems like doing it at 1 am was a bad idea...

Member

create alias tail_tufts (0) -> tail_tuft (61814)

Reason: Shouldve been an alias. (I hope I am doing this right) (couldn't find how to set it to this topic in an alias request)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2789 (forum #339294) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator almost 2 years ago

Janitor