The bulk update request #2764 is active.

remove implication cum_in_mouth (94651) -> cum (702578)
create implication cum_in_throat (1004) -> cum_inside (407655)
remove implication cum_in_throat (1004) -> cum (702578)
remove implication cum_in_own_mouth (5603) -> cum_on_self (37871)
create implication cum_in_own_ass (187) -> cum_in_self (6330)
create implication cum_in_own_ass (187) -> cum_in_ass (139944)
create implication cum_in_own_pussy (140) -> cum_in_self (6330)
create implication cum_in_own_pussy (140) -> cum_in_pussy (156079)
create implication cum_in_own_slit (96) -> cum_in_self (6330)
create implication cum_in_own_slit (96) -> cum_in_slit (808)
create implication cum_in_slit (808) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_self (6330) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_own_hair (80) -> cum_in_hair (9143)
create implication cum_in_own_hair (80) -> cum_on_self (37871)
create alias cum_in_fur (0) -> cum_on_fur (858)

Part 1: Cumming In And On Oneself

• cum_in_mouth needlessly implies cum directly, when it is already implied via cum_inside.

• cum_in_throat also needlessly implies cum directly, but in this case it also fails to imply cum_inside.

• cum_in_own_mouth should not imply cum_on_self. This was brought up in topic #27215, but never addressed.

• cum_in_own_ass and cum_in_own_pussy should have implications to match cum_in_own_mouth. This was also mentioned in topic #27215.

• Not only is cum_in_own_slit missing its implications, so is cum_in_slit.

• cum_in_self is distinguished from cum_on_self by the fact that it should imply cum_inside. Make it do that.

• cum_in_own_hair should imply cum_in_hair, which already implies both cum and hair. Every post is currently tagged with cum_on_self despite no implication existing. I would say this should be cum_on_hair instead, but that's already been aliased the other way.

• The same cannot be said for cum_on_fur, which has far more posts than cum_in_fur and is exactly the same.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2764 (forum #339073) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2765 is active.

Part 2: Cum (In) Buckets (And Assorted Other Containers)

• cum_in_a_cup and cum_in_bucket are subtags of cum_in_container. All three should, but don't, imply cum. cum_bucket is the same tag as cum_in_bucket but doesn't fit the naming scheme. Neither imply bucket.

• cum_in_bowl is also a subtag of cum_in_container, but implies cum directly instead.

• More container tags: cum_in_jar and cum_in_bottle imply nothing. (cum_in_bowl already implies bowl. I decided not to add a second implication to cum_in_a_cup as it's too generic, and it might be necessary to disambiguate it in the future.)

• I aliased cum_jar for the same reason as cum_bucket, but a cum_jar_(meme) copyright tag might be a good idea. The cum_bowl alias already exists. cum_bottle had only one post.

• cum_in_toy and cum_in_sex_toy are the same tag. We generally prefer "sex toy" naming schemes. Also neither of them imply cum. I didn't add an implication to penetrable_sex_toy as both of these tags are widely used with breeding_mounts, which we should probably clean up. As for cum_in_fleshlight, fleshlight has already been aliased to penetrable_sex_toy.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2765 (forum #339075) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2766 is active.

create implication cum_in_penis (681) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_balls (169) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_navel (425) -> cum (702578)
create implication cum_in_tentacles (461) -> cum (702578)
create alias cum_in_ears (6) -> cum_in_ear (686)
create implication cum_in_ear (686) -> cum_inside (407655)
create alias cum_in_nostrils (0) -> cum_in_nose (5932)
create implication cum_in_stomach (260) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_urethra (271) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_bladder (95) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_gills (59) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_ovaries (131) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_brain (50) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_intestines (43) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_lungs (12) -> cum_inside (407655)
create implication cum_in_head (34) -> cum_inside (407655)

Part 3: An Increasingly Alarming List Of Body Parts Which Have Been Cum Inside

• cum_in_penis was a tricky one. It currently has no implications. I decided to imply it to cum_inside, as it seems to be used for urethral_penetration and I found little evidence of it being used for things like docking.

• I was worried that cum_in_balls might be used for internal views of a character's own cum in their own balls (yes I know that's not how anatomy works, but furries). However, a review of usage suggests that is not the case, so I implied it to cum_inside too.

• Conversely, I decided to follow the cum_in_nipples precedent for cum_in_navel and imply it to cum only.

• When you cum_in_tentacles, are they defined as an "orifice" as specified by the cum_inside wiki? I decided probably not.

• cum_in_hands and cum_in_hand are too similar by usage and we prefer singular tags. There should possibly be a separate, dedicated tag for poses like the one in post #2461931, but that is by no means the majority of cum_in_hands posts.

• cum_in_ears has even less of an excuse - these are just straight-up the same tag.

• cum_in_nostrils (14 posts) is the same tag as cum_in_nose (3.5k posts), which is already fully implicated. Unless anyone has any suggestions as to how the nostrils might not be involved?

• If cum_in_uterus already implies cum_inside, cum_in_stomach probably should too.

• A lot of other internal organs follow via the transitive property of cum_in_uterus.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2766 (forum #339076) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2767 is active.

Part 4: The Final Spurts

• Although some may disagree, I postulate that coffee does in fact count as a beverage. The next question is, how many other viable subtags are there? Cum in beer, maybe?

• All of the cum_in_slime pictures are just mistagged cum_in_goo.

• I noticed that cum_in_toilet was being used for characters cumming into urinals, so I separated those posts into a new cum_in_urinal tag. It's now safe to imply toilet and urinal from the respective cum tags. Also cum, of course.

• cum_in_partner's_clothing was problematic - neither cum_in_clothing nor cum_on_clothing seem to encompass this scenario. I decided to just leave it as its own thing and imply cum directly.

• cum_in_diaper implies cum but not diaper for some reason. cum_in_panties and cum_in_jockstrap are just more subtags of the fully implied cum_in_underwear. cum_inside_clothing is a trivial mistake that I spotted while looking for something else.

• The rest are fairly straightforward.

Problematic tags not included

• I decided not to add anything for cum_in_tail on the basis that the correct implication for it would probably be cum_inside, but this tag is mistakenly used instead of cum_on_tail on a massive scale. I just cleaned it up and the number of posts went from 33 to 14. We really need to come up with a single tag for penetrating a tail that isn't tail_penetration, which bizarrely means the opposite, and then maybe think about cleaning up these tags properly.

• cum_in_flask: Seems like it should join the cum_in_container gang but there's no corresponding flask tag, or at least not one which fits the slightly shrill description on the cum_in_flask wiki page.

• cum_in_suit: Does not mean what it sounds like it means at all. I still don't understand the difference between a condom_suit, a rubber_suit, a bodysuit and a skinsuit, so I refuse to touch this one. I want it renamed anyway.

• cum_in_object: Collecting all the potential implications for this is probably a project in itself. Do sex toys count?

• cum_in_helmet, cum_in_hat: Do we really have to replicate the full, strange hat -> headwear -> headgear hierarchy for the sake of 22 posts across both tags?

EDIT: The bulk update request #2767 (forum #339077) has been approved by @slyroon.

Actually, you know what would be a good name for a tag for post #2461931 and the others like it? holding_cum, which has been aliased to cum_in_hands and I'm pretty sure is the thing blocking my alias from going through. It was aliased by a deactivated admin in 2015 with no forum thread.

As for cum_in_toy, that appears to be the fault of topic #28279, which is already disputed anyway.

Both of my implication suggestions for cum_in_bucket have been suggested before, at topic #24356 and topic #24024, but for cum_bucket instead so need rejecting. An identical alias to my own is proposed at topic #33652. A reverse alias, with far more dissent, was previously proposed at topic #23737.

On further review, I've decided to imply cum_in_hand to cum_on_hand. That tag already implies cum. Also, cum_on_hands has been aliased, further reinforcing my decision to alias cum_in_hands. The main question is, does anyone think cum_in_hand versus cum_on_hand is a distinction worth maintaining?

Also nobody called me out on trying to both imply and alias cum_in_slime in the same BUR.

wat8548 said:

• I decided not to add anything for cum_in_tail on the basis that the correct implication for it would probably be cum_inside, but this tag is mistakenly used instead of cum_on_tail on a massive scale. I just cleaned it up and the number of posts went from 33 to 19.

Update: The new total is 14. I have just discovered that, unbeknownst to me, I had the misfortune of doing this cleanup right in the middle of a large scale vandal attack. user #1212407 was sitting on the changes page and blindly clicking "Undo" on every new edit that came in. My edits were far from the only ones affected.

Bump, I was about to request some of the things in the first one.

This puddle of cum has now been festering for close to a year, and with how many things in it keep getting re-suggested, I think it's long overdue for a serious look.

Changelog:

• Removed cum_in_eye, cum_in_pouch implications (already approved elsewhere)
• Removed cum_in_hands and cum_in_hand (cum_in_hand was aliased to cum_on_hand instead)

Updated list of conflicting forum threads:

• Should be rejected (conflicts):
• topic #23737 (cum_bucket)
• topic #28279 (cum_in_sex_toy)
• topic #24024, topic #24356 (adds implications to cum_bucket)
• Should either be rejected or approved first (duplicates):
• topic #25256 (cum_in_slit)
• topic #39234, topic #39235, topic #39236, topic #39237, topic #39238 (all for cum_in_container implications)
• topic #33652 (cum_bucket again)

More duplicate threads:

topic #38900
topic #39893

Bumping again after the recent rejection spree. There are now no conflicting requests, though all the duplicates mentioned in the previous two posts are still pending.

Bump

The bulk update request #2764 (forum #339073) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2765 (forum #339075) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2766 (forum #339076) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #2767 (forum #339077) has been approved by @slyroon.

wat8548 said:
The bulk update request #2765 is active.

create implication cum_in_a_cup (1826) -> cum_in_container (4340)
create alias cum_bucket (4) -> cum_in_bucket (769)
create implication cum_in_bucket (769) -> cum_in_container (4340)
create implication cum_in_bucket (769) -> bucket (5557)
create implication cum_in_bowl (1097) -> cum_in_container (4340)
remove implication cum_in_bowl (1097) -> cum (702578)
create alias cum_jar (0) -> cum_in_jar (225)
create implication cum_in_jar (225) -> cum_in_container (4340)
create implication cum_in_jar (225) -> jar (2391)
create implication cum_in_bottle (120) -> cum_in_container (4340)
create implication cum_in_bottle (120) -> bottle (21600)
create implication cum_in_container (4340) -> cum (702578)
create alias cum_in_toy (0) -> cum_in_sex_toy (776)
create alias cum_in_fleshlight (0) -> cum_in_sex_toy (776)
create implication cum_in_sex_toy (776) -> cum (702578)

Part 2: Cum (In) Buckets (And Assorted Other Containers)

• cum_in_a_cup and cum_in_bucket are subtags of cum_in_container. All three should, but don't, imply cum. cum_bucket is the same tag as cum_in_bucket but doesn't fit the naming scheme. Neither imply bucket.

• cum_in_bowl is also a subtag of cum_in_container, but implies cum directly instead.

• More container tags: cum_in_jar and cum_in_bottle imply nothing. (cum_in_bowl already implies bowl. I decided not to add a second implication to cum_in_a_cup as it's too generic, and it might be necessary to disambiguate it in the future.)

• I aliased cum_jar for the same reason as cum_bucket, but a cum_jar_(meme) copyright tag might be a good idea. The cum_bowl alias already exists. cum_bottle had only one post.

• cum_in_toy and cum_in_sex_toy are the same tag. We generally prefer "sex toy" naming schemes. Also neither of them imply cum. I didn't add an implication to penetrable_sex_toy as both of these tags are widely used with breeding_mounts, which we should probably clean up. As for cum_in_fleshlight, fleshlight has already been aliased to penetrable_sex_toy.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2765 (forum #339075) has been approved by @slyroon.

This cum_jar alias just applied cum to a bunch of posts which have no cum present
it should be unaliased, then invalidated due to its conflicting usage. Aliasing straight to cum_in_jar has caused a mess.

The bulk update request #6216 is active.

remove alias cum_jar (0) -> cum_in_jar (225)

Reason: The cum jar tag had two distinct usages, one of which does not require cum to be present, thus it should not be aliased to cum in jar. In my opinion, it should be invalidated instead, and not aliased anywhere. People can move the posts to cum in jar or pony cum jar project, whichever is meant by the tag.

I know of at least 16 posts that popped up on my radar for being tagged cum on a non-explicit post due to this alias, and I'm sure there are many more.

• https://e621.net/posts/4437554
• https://e621.net/posts/4392739
• https://e621.net/posts/4392739
• https://e621.net/posts/3992394
• https://e621.net/posts/3992352
• https://e621.net/posts/3984499
• https://e621.net/posts/3719397
• https://e621.net/posts/3674830
• https://e621.net/posts/3214041
• https://e621.net/posts/2669317
• https://e621.net/posts/2487306
• https://e621.net/posts/2273470
• https://e621.net/posts/2268895
• https://e621.net/posts/2146226
• https://e621.net/posts/1809758
• https://e621.net/posts/2783062

EDIT: The bulk update request #6216 (forum #386605) has been approved by @slyroon.

donovan_dmc said:
Reason: The cum jar tag had two distinct usages, one of which does not require cum to be present, thus it should not be aliased to cum in jar. In my opinion, it should be invalidated instead, and not aliased anywhere. People can move the posts to cum in jar or pony cum jar project, whichever is meant by the tag.

Considering the admin response last time I tried to disambiguate a tag which was running at about 20% mistags - similar to cum_jar, judging by a survey of the first page of additions - I wouldn't hold your breath.

The bulk update request #6216 (forum #386605) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6801 is active.

change category cum_jar (0) -> invalid

Reason: Followup

EDIT: The bulk update request #6801 (forum #392794) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6801 (forum #392794) has been approved by @slyroon.