Topic: Thinking with portals BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2562 has been rejected.

create implication non-euclidean_masturbation (536) -> masturbation (161461)
create implication non-euclidean_sex (1738) -> sex (1039200)
create implication portal_fellatio (21) -> portal_sex (1309)
create implication portal_fellatio (21) -> fellatio (159493)
create implication portal_fleshlight (584) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_gag (32) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_mask (86) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_mouth (12) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_panties (515) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_penis (475) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_saddle (4) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_strapon (51) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_amputation (292) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create alias quadruple_amputee_portal (159) -> portal_quadruple_amputation (0)
create implication portal_quadruple_amputation (0) -> portal_amputation (292)
create implication portal_prosthetic (4) -> portal_amputation (292)
create implication portal_storage (0) -> portal_amputation (292)

Reason: Non-euclidean sex and masturbation are forms of sex and masturbation.

Fellatio is a form of sex.

Portal fleshlights, panties, amputations, etc are unusual applications of portals that can be present without portals themselves being visible.

γ…€portal_quadruple_amputation is more in line with other portal tags.

Portal prosthetic can only be called so when attached to a portal amputee.

Portally amputated bodyparts can only be stored if they're amputated. (There might be a name better than portal_storage)

I thought about making a distinction between portal amputee and amputation, but:

  • It's a constant process - limbs easily go in and out unless firmly secured (as long as portal is active😈).
  • Not enough posts.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has failed: Error: portal_strapon already implies thinking_with_portals through another implication (create implication portal_strapon -> thinking_with_portals)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has failed: Error: portal_strapon already implies thinking_with_portals through another implication (create implication portal_strapon -> thinking_with_portals)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2562 (forum #336091) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #2563 is active.

create implication portal_mask (86) -> mask (49612)
create implication portal_gag (32) -> gag (48413)
create implication portal_panties (515) -> panties (158591)
create implication portal_penis (475) -> penis (1580382)
create implication portal_saddle (4) -> saddle (3278)

Reason: (continued from original post)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2563 (forum #336092) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #2564 is active.

create implication portal_fleshlight (584) -> penetrable_sex_toy (8111)
create implication portal_strapon (51) -> strapon (11209)
create implication portal_strapon (51) -> portal_dildo (61)
mass update portal_penis -> portal_dildo
create implication portal_dildo (61) -> portal_penis (475)
create implication portal_dildo (61) -> dildo (83345)

Reason: Portal-ed sex organs are basically sex toys, but living. I suggest to treat them as scuh.

Currently most of portal_penises are actually portal_dildoes (they can be moved about freely). I suggest to move them into that category, and from then on tag any penis shoved in a portal (including stationary one) as portal_penis.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2564 (forum #336093) has been approved by @Millcore.

Updated by auto moderator

gattonero2001 said:
cough cough topic #33907 cough cough

Funny that, I checked for duplicates when I started work on the project but that was around 8 hours ago.
Edit:
Here's the proof: post changes #1080892.
Should I remove these entries, or is it better to have a single big BUR instead of two smaller ones?

Updated

waydence said:
Anyone wants to say anything?
Well I guess I'll remove them.

It takes time for the admins to go through the queue. There's nothing wrong with your BURs, just be patient please.

What happened, did I break something? Looking back, there are a few rather ambiguous tags, so I guess it's good.

portal_storage feels a bit vague imo, the current intent seems to bne to use it for bodypart storage, but at a first glance, it could be for regular, general-purpose storage of anything .3.

The bulk update request #6720 is active.

create implication non-euclidean_masturbation (536) -> masturbation (161461)
create implication portal_fellatio (21) -> fellatio (159493)
create implication portal_fellatio (21) -> portal_sex (1309)
create implication portal_cunnilingus (4) -> cunnilingus (35705)
create implication portal_cunnilingus (4) -> portal_sex (1309)
create implication portal_tribadism (1) -> tribadism (5820)
create implication portal_tribadism (1) -> portal_sex (1309)
create implication portal_fleshlight (584) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_gag (32) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_mask (86) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_mouth (12) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_panties (515) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_penis (475) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_saddle (4) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)
create implication portal_amputation (292) -> thinking_with_portals (2532)

Reason: Rewrite of the BUR above without the technical issue, as well as adding some additional portal tags found. I tried to avoid anything that was already implied in separate implication requests, will edit the BUR as needed.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6720 (forum #392144) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1