Topic: [FAILED] Latex_* implies latex

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2420 is active.

create implication latex_clothing (26710) -> latex (57601)
create implication latex_skin (540) -> latex (57601)
create implication latex_topwear (1140) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_bottomwear (469) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_handwear (7362) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_footwear (1627) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_skinsuit (12344) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_underwear (809) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_armwear (4094) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_legwear (9995) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_dress (248) -> latex_clothing (26710)
create implication latex_pants (136) -> latex_bottomwear (469)
create implication latex_boots (1495) -> latex_footwear (1627)
create implication latex_hood (290) -> latex_headwear (305)
create implication latex_stockings (5490) -> latex_legwear (9995)
create implication latex_thigh_highs (3422) -> latex_legwear (9995)
create implication latex_gloves (7158) -> latex_handware (1236)
create implication latex_elbow_gloves (1788) -> latex_armwear (4094)
create implication latex_bra (210) -> latex_underwear (809)
create implication latex_leggings (39) -> latex_legwear (9995)
create implication latex_panties (363) -> latex_underwear (809)
create implication latex_socks (77) -> latex_footwear (1627)
create implication latex_bodysuit (1129) -> latex_skinsuit (12344)

Reason: latex_* implies latex by nature of latex, the material, being a prefix of the other tag.

Edit: latex_* should imply latex_clothing and latex_clothing should imply latex

EDIT: The bulk update request #2420 (forum #333403) has failed: Error: latex_crop_top already implies latex_topwear through another implication (create implication latex_crop_top -> latex_topwear)

EDIT: The bulk update request #2420 (forum #333403) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

These should be unnecessary:

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_topwear -> latex
create implication latex_bottomwear -> latex
create implication latex_elbow_gloves -> latex
create implication latex_handwear -> latex
create implication latex_footwear -> latex
create implication latex_skinsuit -> latex
create implication latex_underwear -> latex
create implication latex_crop_top -> latex
create implication latex_bra -> latex
create implication latex_thigh_highs -> latex
create implication latex_armwear -> latex
create implication latex_leggings -> latex
create implication latex_panties -> latex
create implication latex_socks -> latex
create implication latex_bodysuit -> latex
create implication latex_legwear -> latex
create implication latex_dress -> latex
create implication latex_hood -> latex
create implication latex_stockings -> latex
create implication latex_pants -> latex

These should instead imply latex_clothing (or latex_bottomwear, etc, that themselves implicate latex_clothing), and only latex_clothing needs to imply latex.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_gloves -> latex_clothing

This should imply latex_handwear.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_crop_top -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_topwear.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_bra -> latex_clothing
create implication latex_panties -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_underwear.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_thigh_highs -> latex_clothing
create implication latex_leggings -> latex_clothing
create implication latex_boots -> latex_clothing
create implication latex_stockings -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_legwear.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_socks -> latex_clothing
create implication latex_boots -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_footwear.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_elbow_gloves -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_armwear.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_hood -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_headwear.

watsit said:

create implication latex_boots -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_legwear.

create implication latex_boots -> latex_clothing

Should imply latex_footwear.

Boots should only imply footwear, not legwear.

bdanimare said:
create implication latex_skin -> latex_clothing

Skin isn’t clothing, so this one should imply latex directly.

create implication latex_bodysuit -> latex_clothing

bodysuit implies skinsuit, so this should imply latex_skinsuit instead.

Fix these along with everything else Watsit said, and I think you’re good to go.

scaliespe said:
Boots should only imply footwear, not legwear.

Skin isn’t clothing, so this one should imply latex directly.

bodysuit implies skinsuit, so this should imply latex_skinsuit instead.

Fix these along with everything else Watsit said, and I think you’re good to go.

latex_skinsuit would imply skinsuit, right? Also aren't bodysuit and skinsuit the same?

bdanimare said:
latex_skinsuit would imply skinsuit, right? Also aren't bodysuit and skinsuit the same?

bodysuit said:
Bodysuit is a type of skin-tight garment (skinsuit)

So a bodysuit is a type of skinsuit; specifically, one that covers the whole torso. Latex_bodysuit should therefore imply both bodysuit and latex_skinsuit in order to remain consistent with the current implication chain.

scaliespe said:
So a bodysuit is a type of skinsuit; specifically, one that covers the whole torso. Latex_bodysuit should therefore imply both bodysuit and latex_skinsuit in order to remain consistent with the current implication chain.

Ah, gotcha.

Just noticed one more: latex_pants should imply latex_bottomwear instead of latex_clothing.

  • 1