Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: color_jockstrap -> jockstrap

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2352 is active.

create alias gray_jockstrap (0) -> grey_jockstrap (21)
create implication black_jockstrap (305) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication blue_jockstrap (165) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication brown_jockstrap (12) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication green_jockstrap (111) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication grey_jockstrap (21) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication multicolored_jockstrap (171) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication orange_jockstrap (66) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication pink_jockstrap (76) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication purple_jockstrap (85) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication red_jockstrap (314) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication tan_jockstrap (0) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication two_tone_jockstrap (54) -> multicolored_jockstrap (171)
create implication white_jockstrap (235) -> jockstrap (19527)
create implication yellow_jockstrap (66) -> jockstrap (19527)

Reason: Colored jockstraps are jockstraps

EDIT: The bulk update request #2352 (forum #332976) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #2353 is active.

create implication black_jockstrap (305) -> black_underwear (16420)
create implication blue_jockstrap (165) -> blue_underwear (7287)
create implication brown_jockstrap (12) -> brown_underwear (404)
create implication green_jockstrap (111) -> green_underwear (3359)
create implication grey_jockstrap (21) -> grey_underwear (1438)
create implication orange_jockstrap (66) -> orange_underwear (1189)
create implication pink_jockstrap (76) -> pink_underwear (10496)
create implication purple_jockstrap (85) -> purple_underwear (3928)
create implication red_jockstrap (314) -> red_underwear (8964)
create implication tan_jockstrap (0) -> tan_underwear (150)
create implication two_tone_jockstrap (54) -> two_tone_underwear (844)
create implication white_jockstrap (235) -> white_underwear (18828)
create implication yellow_jockstrap (66) -> yellow_underwear (1764)

Reason: Colored jockstraps are Colored underwear

EDIT: The bulk update request #2353 (forum #332977) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

bitWolfy

Former Staff
implicate translucent_jockstrap -> jockstrap # duplicate of implication #24403
implicate translucent_jockstrap -> translucent_underwear # duplicate of implication #24388

Please, fix errors in your BURs next time.
Running the script through the debugger never hurts.

  • 1