The bulk update request #2221 is active.

Reason:
The aliases are because official media writes out the number when referring to incarnations of this character. topic #23559, an implication request for fourth_doctor -> 4th_doctor, would need to be rejected before this BUR could be approved.
The implications are because these are all different incarnations) of the same character, although they have different appearances and personalities.

I'm not sure if the_doctor should stay as it is or if it should be the_doctor_(doctor_who) instead. What do you guys think, is it too ambiguous?

EDIT: The bulk update request #2221 (forum #330274) has been approved by @slyroon.

As a mere user I cannot say anything about your BUR... but one thing I want to say, is that I am very thankful to the British, for doing those good TV series in the 60s and 70s, that made my childhood very interesting...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkelV2WUNdw (Dr. Who).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slYW7kkHyI4 (UFO).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SpX8bVEmJo (Space 1999).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10QW3Az1FTw (The Avengers).

=).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCsXO7r6-z4

=).

https://e621.net/posts?tags=dalek

cloudpie said:
i'm not sure if the_doctor should stay as it is or if it should be the_doctor_(doctor_who) instead. What do you guys think, is it too ambiguous?

To be honest, there's characters from other franchises who could be labeled as "the doctor" simply because they have no official name, although the only one that comes to mind is the EMH from Star Trek: Voyager. It's also possible someone might forget the "the" when tagging, accidentally turning the Time Lord into just a medical practitioner. Using the suffix would be best, in my opinion, perhaps throwing in a doctor_(doctor_who) –> the_doctor_(doctor_who) alias to help taggers via auto-complete.

Here's the alias request blocking fourth_doctor by the way

The bulk update request #3937 is active.

create implication twelfth_doctor (0) -> the_doctor_(doctor_who) (102)
create implication thirteenth_doctor (8) -> the_doctor_(doctor_who) (102)
create implication cyberman (4) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication rose_tyler (3) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication captain_jack_harkness (0) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication amy_pond (7) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication martha_jones (0) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication clara_oswald (2) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication river_song (1) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication jenny_flint (2) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication madame_vastra (3) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication novice_hame (2) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication androvax (1) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication adipose_(doctor_who) (1) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication judoon (0) -> doctor_who (410)
create implication silurian (5) -> doctor_who (410)

Reason: Doctor Who BUR part 2 - had to remake it so it could be in the same thread as part 1

EDIT: The bulk update request #3937 (forum #354831) has been approved by @slyroon.

Changing the_doctor to the_doctor_(doctor_who) as well since the_doctor is too ambiguous

topic #23559 was auto-rejected so no more blocking transitives

The bulk update request #2221 (forum #330274) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #3937 (forum #354831) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6393 is active.

create implication the_doctor_(doctor_who) (102) -> doctor_who (410)

Reason: Looks like i forgot a line back then

EDIT: The bulk update request #6393 (forum #389247) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6393 (forum #389247) has been approved by @slyroon.