Topic: [REJECTED] Pokémon Legends Arceus

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2161 has been rejected.

create implication ursaluna (185) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
create implication kleavor (11) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
create implication overqwil (5) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
create implication enamorus (38) -> legendary_pokémon (0)
create implication enamorus_(incarnate_form) (33) -> enamorus (38)
create implication enamorus_(therian_form) (5) -> enamorus (38)
create implication origin_forme_dialga (12) -> dialga (579)
create implication origin_forme_palkia (13) -> palkia (611)
create implication white-striped_basculin (3) -> basculin (39)
create implication hisuian_growlithe (362) -> regional_form_(pokémon) (0)

Reason: ursaluna, kleavor, overqwil, and enamorus are pokémon who debuted in pokémon legends arceus
hisuian forms also debuted in pokémon legends arceus
the origin formes of dialga and palkia debuted in pokémon legends arceus too
enamorus is a legendary pokémon with an incarnate form and a therian form
white-striped basculin is a form of basculin

EDIT: The bulk update request #2161 (forum #329484) has been rejected by @Millcore.

Updated

Oh would you look at that, 90% of those are duplicates. Look up implications and BURs.

While Ursaluna, Kleavor, and Overqwil make sense to imply pokemon species, and White-Striped Basculin to imply basculin (which is a group name, not a base name), Palkia and Dialga are new forms.

...Huh, didn't realize there was a new Genie/Guardian of Nature pokemon. Enamorus would be another umbrella tag. However, legendary_pokemon should soon be implying pokemon_(species), so it only needs to imply to legendary. Everything else can be deleted from the list out of being a duplicate in addition to those that are bad.

furrin_gok said:
Oh would you look at that, 90% of those are duplicates. Look up implications and BURs.

Dude literally remade all his implication suggestions into a BUR and hidden all the threads.

  • 1