Topic: [APPROVED] Tag implication: gag_color -> gag

The bulk update request #2104 is active.

create implication white_gag (8) -> gag (56412)
create implication brown_gag (0) -> gag (56412)
create implication blue_gag (31) -> gag (56412)
create implication black_gag (40) -> gag (56412)
create implication grey_gag (9) -> gag (56412)
create implication yellow_gag (8) -> gag (56412)
create implication orange_gag (5) -> gag (56412)
create implication two_tone_gag (0) -> gag (56412)
create implication tan_gag (0) -> gag (56412)
create implication purple_gag (17) -> gag (56412)
create implication red_gag (91) -> gag (56412)
create implication green_gag (0) -> gag (56412)
create implication pink_gag (27) -> gag (56412)
create implication multicolored_gag (0) -> gag (56412)
create alias gray_gag (0) -> grey_gag (9)

Reason: colored gags are gags

EDIT: The bulk update request #2104 (forum #328639) has been approved by @slyroon.

clickbait titles

thegreatwolfgang said:
clickbait titles

I just tried to make the title look good o.o'

Not sure how color tags work. Since different gag types are categorized by color (ie. red_ball_gag ) and imply ball_gag.

Should color_(gag type) imply the color, and then color_(gag) then imply gag?

leotheairwolf said:
Not sure how color tags work. Since different gag types are categorized by color (ie. red_ball_gag ) and imply ball_gag.

Should color_(gag type) imply the color, and then color_(gag) then imply gag?

red_ball_gag -> red_gag, ball_gag
red_gag -> gag

my stupid ass was trying to figure out how a pun could have a color.

The bulk update request #2104 (forum #328639) has been approved by @slyroon.