The bulk update request #1874 is pending approval.

create alias messing_diaper (4) -> soiling_diaper (2380)
remove implication soiled_diaper (5506) -> messy_diaper (0)
create alias messing_diaper (4) -> soiling_diaper (2380)
create alias messing (7) -> soiling (6506)
create alias soggy_diaper (0) -> wet_diaper (6197)
create alias padded (171) -> diaper (25495)
create alias pamp (0) -> diaper (25495)
create alias pamper (2) -> diaper (25495)

Reason: Thought I'd try to make sense of all the shitty diaper tags.

This BUR has soiling_diaper as the "main" tag for making feces into a diaper, and messy_diaper as the "main" tag for a diaper that already has feces in it. This is because these two seem to be the most commonly tagged, and because they already have nice wiki pages for them.

As for non-diaper tags, messing is the diaperless version of soiling, and soiled the diaperless version of messy. Only issue is that messy is meant to be used for non-feces related things EG a messy room, so I don't know what should be done with the soiled tag.

The padded tag is currently 100% diaper content. Padding might be a bit more complicated, because it can also be used for EG a padded room one may see in an asylum.

Pamp, pamper, and pampering are slang for Pampers, a specific brand of diaper, which has come to just represent any diaper. However, the tags could also conceivably be used to represent "pampering", as in giving attention to. Dictionary definition Changed to alias all three to diaper. Removed pampering.

Please let me know your thoughts/concerns, and if I'm overstepping any boundaries by doing this.

Part 2:

alias soiled_diaper -> messy_diaper

minishtube said:
Pamp, pamper, and pampering are slang for Pampers, a specific brand of diaper, which has come to just represent any diaper. However, the tags could also conceivably be used to represent "pampering", as in giving attention to. Dictionary definition

Given the current use, wouldn’t it be better to just alias them to diaper rather than invalidating them? I can’t imagine many people using the word in the traditional sense, and I’d rather not add to the ever-growing list of invalid tags that need to be monitored and cleaned up unless there’s a good reason to do so.

scaliespe said:
Given the current use, wouldn’t it be better to just alias them to diaper rather than invalidating them? I can’t imagine many people using the word in the traditional sense, and I’d rather not add to the ever-growing list of invalid tags that need to be monitored and cleaned up unless there’s a good reason to do so.

That was another thought I had, but I didn't know which option would be better. Changed them.

minishtube said:
The bulk update request #1874 is pending approval.

create alias messing_diaper (4) -> soiling_diaper (2380)
remove implication soiled_diaper (5506) -> messy_diaper (0)
create alias messing_diaper (4) -> soiling_diaper (2380)
create alias messing (7) -> soiling (6506)
create alias soggy_diaper (0) -> wet_diaper (6197)
create alias padded (171) -> diaper (25495)
create alias pamp (0) -> diaper (25495)
create alias pamper (2) -> diaper (25495)

Reason: Thought I'd try to make sense of all the shitty diaper tags.

This BUR has soiling_diaper as the "main" tag for making feces into a diaper, and messy_diaper as the "main" tag for a diaper that already has feces in it. This is because these two seem to be the most commonly tagged, and because they already have nice wiki pages for them.

As for non-diaper tags, messing is the diaperless version of soiling, and soiled the diaperless version of messy. Only issue is that messy is meant to be used for non-feces related things EG a messy room, so I don't know what should be done with the soiled tag.

The padded tag is currently 100% diaper content. Padding might be a bit more complicated, because it can also be used for EG a padded room one may see in an asylum.

Pamp, pamper, and pampering are slang for Pampers, a specific brand of diaper, which has come to just represent any diaper. However, the tags could also conceivably be used to represent "pampering", as in giving attention to. Dictionary definition Changed to alias all three to diaper.

Please let me know your thoughts/concerns, and if I'm overstepping any boundaries by doing this.

The majority of images tagged pampering are of characters being luxuriously attended to, rather than anything diaper related

penguinempire-dennis said:
The majority of images tagged pampering are of characters being luxuriously attended to, rather than anything diaper related

It seems so, yes. Perhaps just remove that one, and clean out the mistags from it manually. Otherwise, +1

scaliespe said:
It seems so, yes. Perhaps just remove that one, and clean out the mistags from it manually. Otherwise, +1

done

Actually, it looks like pamper is the same situation. No diaper posts in there currently. Only pamp seems to be exclusively diaper (well, the one post it’s used on, but still).
So perhaps alias pamper -> pampering instead.

scaliespe said:
Actually, it looks like pamper is the same situation. No diaper posts in there currently. Only pamp seems to be exclusively diaper (well, the one post it’s used on, but still).
So perhaps alias pamper -> pampering instead.

I'd imagine that pamp and pamper would be more commonly used on posts featuring diaper content than pampering content. I don't remember exactly since last week when I created the BUR, but I'm 85% sure that pamp and pamper had more diaper related posts, someone might've cleaned them out. I fixed the two pamper posts.