The bulk update request #1870 is active.

create implication birdie_the_early_bird (24) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication birdie_the_early_bird (24) -> mascot (6388)
create implication grimace_(mcdonald's) (59) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication grimace_(mcdonald's) (59) -> mascot (6388)
create implication hamburglar (5) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication hamburglar (5) -> mascot (6388)
create implication happy_(mcdonald's) (1) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication happy_(mcdonald's) (1) -> mascot (6388)
create implication mac_tonight (12) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication mac_tonight (12) -> mascot (6388)
create implication ronald_mcdonald (48) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication ronald_mcdonald (48) -> mascot (6388)

Reason: Imply various McDonald's mascots to the mcdonald's tag.

Should these also implicate mascot?

EDIT: The bulk update request #1870 (forum #324981) has been approved by @slyroon.

faucet said:
Should these also implicate mascot?

I think so.

The bulk update request #5170 is active.

create alias grimace_birthday_shake (6) -> grimace_shake (200)
create implication grimace_shake (200) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication grimace_shake (200) -> meme (53614)

Reason: it's a meme and it's (c) mcdonalds

EDIT: The bulk update request #5170 (forum #370050) has been approved by @slyroon.

faucet said:
The bulk update request #5170 is active.

create alias grimace_birthday_shake (6) -> grimace_shake (200)
create implication grimace_shake (200) -> mcdonald's (920)
create implication grimace_shake (200) -> meme (53614)

Reason: it's a meme and it's (c) mcdonalds

It's officially just the Grimace Shake. The tag should be aliased to "grimace_shake" and that should be implicated to "mcdonald's" and "meme".

alien_fluff said:
It's officially just the Grimace Shake. The tag should be aliased to "grimace_shake" and that should be implicated to "mcdonald's" and "meme".

Edited. Now there's blocking transitive relationships... I think topic #39282 might need to be rejected first.

faucet said:
Edited. Now there's blocking transitive relationships... I think topic #39282 might need to be rejected first.

Rejected it.

leotheairwolf said:
Rejected it.

Thank you, looks like the blocking transitive relationships message is gone now.

The bulk update request #1870 (forum #324981) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #5170 (forum #370050) has been approved by @slyroon.