The bulk update request #1659 is pending approval.

create implication striped_body (63974) -> striped_markings (46032)
create implication striped_arms (3222) -> striped_markings (46032)
create implication striped_legs (3258) -> striped_markings (46032)
create implication striped_hair (878) -> striped_markings (46032)
create implication striped_ears (1249) -> striped_markings (46032)
create implication striped_genitalia (1332) -> striped_markings (46032)
create implication spotted_body (57785) -> spotted_markings (12492)
create implication spotted_arms (1207) -> spotted_markings (12492)
create implication spotted_legs (1439) -> spotted_markings (12492)
create implication spotted_hair (427) -> spotted_markings (12492)
create implication spotted_ears (509) -> spotted_markings (12492)
create implication spotted_genitalia (704) -> spotted_markings (12492)

Reason: body markings should implicate the markings related tag, just as it does with tail. Does anyone else think it would make sense to alias _body tags to _torso tags?

versperus said:
Reason: body markings should implicate the markings related tag, just as it does with tail. Does anyone else think it would make sense to alias _body tags to _torso tags?

I think for example octopi have a body but no torso. As the body wiki says, a body typically includes a torso, but not always.

It is confusing that when something lacks a torso, it can be said that "it doesn't have a body". If we take this sense of the word into use, we should then just alias torso into body. I prefer the current definitions we have.