The bulk update request #1659 is pending approval.

create implication striped_body (58960) -> striped_markings (41297)
create implication striped_arms (2707) -> striped_markings (41297)
create implication striped_legs (2711) -> striped_markings (41297)
create implication striped_hair (785) -> striped_markings (41297)
create implication striped_ears (1146) -> striped_markings (41297)
create implication striped_genitalia (1280) -> striped_markings (41297)
create implication spotted_body (53548) -> spotted_markings (10916)
create implication spotted_arms (1072) -> spotted_markings (10916)
create implication spotted_legs (1270) -> spotted_markings (10916)
create implication spotted_hair (413) -> spotted_markings (10916)
create implication spotted_ears (461) -> spotted_markings (10916)
create implication spotted_genitalia (646) -> spotted_markings (10916)

Reason: body markings should implicate the markings related tag, just as it does with tail. Does anyone else think it would make sense to alias _body tags to _torso tags?

versperus said:
Reason: body markings should implicate the markings related tag, just as it does with tail. Does anyone else think it would make sense to alias _body tags to _torso tags?

I think for example octopi have a body but no torso. As the body wiki says, a body typically includes a torso, but not always.

It is confusing that when something lacks a torso, it can be said that "it doesn't have a body". If we take this sense of the word into use, we should then just alias torso into body. I prefer the current definitions we have.