The bulk update request #1574 is pending approval.

create implication reverse_forced_anal (54) -> forced (94810)

Reason: This will put the tag in line with forced_oral, reverse_forced_oral, and forced_anal, three similar tags.

The following is a longer story/explanation. You only have to read it to understand context. If you’re already convinced, don’t read it. You might think I sound like a shithead xd

So, there was initially the issue that forced_oral, reverse_forced_oral, and forced_anal all imply forced, but there was a section of each’s wiki that stated that the action did not have to be forced. The character’s movement just had to be restricted. This incorrectly includes a lot of bondage art (but only if it includes one of those 3 actions). This seems to be a holdout from the early days of this site when tagging for consent wasn’t set-in-stone.

I decided to fix this by removing that section of the wiki and specifying the action had to be forced. I’m not sure if this was through the proper channels, but it seems like no one’s switched it back.

Now, all that’s left is reverse_forced_anal. Specifying that the tag only applies to examples of forced sex seems to go against its current usage, especially given the fact the tag doesn’t even imply forced.

You might ask why I didn’t just try to unimply forced for the 3 tags, instead of changing their wiki along with the wiki and implication structure of another tag. The simple answer is confusion. People already have trouble tagging forced. Forced_sex (which is supposed to be tagged in all cases where “forced” describes a sexual act) is often entirely neglected, and forced is often overextended to tag any case where force is used in the Newtonian sense.

Having 4 tags starting with forced that aren’t really referring to forced actions only compounds this confusion.

site doesn't do "reverse" tags.

versperus said:
site doesn't do "reverse" tags.

reverse_forced_oral, reversed_forced_vore, and the other reverse_* tags would disagree with that claim.

watsit said:
reverse_forced_oral, reversed_forced_vore, and the other reverse_* tags would disagree with that claim.

I think they were referring to reverse forced tags. At first I thought these tags was used to refer when a female character forces a male character to sex or something like that, but now that I read the wiki carefully and the non-reverse wiki, I'm not sure what's the use of that tag anymore. Hmm~

sieghelm_lockayer said:
I think they were referring to reverse forced tags. At first I thought these tags was used to refer when a female character forces a male character to sex or something like that, but now that I read the wiki carefully and the non-reverse wiki, I'm not sure what's the use of that tag anymore. Hmm~

I think it's for when the "bottom" forces a sex act on the "top", e.g. a character pins someone else down by force and gives them a blowjob, or forces the other character to penetrate their ass. Instead of a character getting penetrated by force, they're being made to penetrate by force.