Implicating toothless → night_fury
Link to implication

Reason:

Toothless is a night fury.

Except when he's drawn as a different species. Not a good idea. (Eg. he's not a Night Fury in the original books.)

all character name -> species implications are bad

EsalRider said:
Except when he's drawn as a different species. Not a good idea. (Eg. he's not a Night Fury in the original books.)

I understand, i didn't think about it, my bad.

Denied