The bulk update request #1396 is pending approval.

create alias endosomatophilia (0) -> endosoma (1437) # duplicate of alias #53520
create alias endosomaphilia (0) -> endosoma (1437)
create alias safe_vore (2015) -> endosoma (1437)

Reason: Endosoma is the most popular form of this tag.
Endosomatophilia is the unabbreviated form of the word.
Endosomaphilia is a variant that's been floating around since the word was created.
Endosoma is a more technical term for safe_vore (vore that is safe for the prey)

According to the soft_vore wiki, these are not the same:
Important Note: A common misconception is that "soft vore" means "safe vore", however "soft" indicates that the character is ingested whole and alive - the prey character can still be digested or absorbed by the predator character. Compare endosoma and full tour which are safe vore scenarios where the prey character is not digested, and either lives inside or is later released from the body, or the opposite, hard vore, where a character is eaten in pieces or chewed.

Also, your first alias is already in effect. The second one has no uses, so it’s probably not necessary, but it wouldn’t hurt to add it either.

Instead of aliasing soft_vore, it could probably be an implication from endosoma to soft_vore. Probably should alias full_tour to soft_vore as well.

The bulk update request #1398 is pending approval.

create alias endosomaphilia (0) -> endosoma (1437)
create implication endosoma (1437) -> soft_vore (9508) # duplicate of implication #16884
create implication full_tour (423) -> soft_vore (9508)
remove implication endosoma (1437) -> vore (69524)
remove implication full_tour (423) -> vore (69524)
remove implication cock_vore (7320) -> vore (69524)
create implication cock_vore (7320) -> urethral_vore (81)
create implication pussy_urethra_vore (29) -> urethral_vore (81)

Reason: According to the soft_vore wiki, endosoma and full tour are forms of soft vore. Also, cock vore is a type of urethral vore, as it utilizes the urethra of the penis.

Edit: added create implication pussy_urethra_vore -> urethral_vore

scaliespe said:
The bulk update request #1398 is pending approval.

create alias endosomaphilia (0) -> endosoma (1437)
create implication endosoma (1437) -> soft_vore (9508) # duplicate of implication #16884
create implication full_tour (423) -> soft_vore (9508)
remove implication endosoma (1437) -> vore (69524)
remove implication full_tour (423) -> vore (69524)
remove implication cock_vore (7320) -> vore (69524)
create implication cock_vore (7320) -> urethral_vore (81)
create implication pussy_urethra_vore (29) -> urethral_vore (81)

Reason: According to the soft_vore wiki, endosoma and full tour are forms of soft vore. Also, cock vore is a type of urethral vore, as it utilizes the urethra of the penis.

Might want to add pussy_urethra_vore -> urethra_vore while you're at it. It's larely untagged for now, but it's only fair to have a counterpart to cock_vore if we're making the implication.

scaliespe said:
According to the soft_vore wiki, these are not the same:
Important Note: A common misconception is that "soft vore" means "safe vore", however "soft" indicates that the character is ingested whole and alive - the prey character can still be digested or absorbed by the predator character. Compare endosoma and full tour which are safe vore scenarios where the prey character is not digested, and either lives inside or is later released from the body, or the opposite, hard vore, where a character is eaten in pieces or chewed.

Also, your first alias is already in effect. The second one has no uses, so it’s probably not necessary, but it wouldn’t hurt to add it either.

Instead of aliasing soft_vore, it could probably be an implication from endosoma to soft_vore. Probably should alias full_tour to soft_vore as well.

First one: Yep, that was me not double-checking. It was unaliased for the longest time, and if you enter the tag in the editor it says there are 4 posts with the tag endosomatophilia while also pointing to the endosoma alias which has hundreds.
Third one: I think you misread. I wrote safe_vore, not soft_vore. "Compare endosoma and full tour which are safe vore scenarios"