Topic: [REJECTED] The Owl House Bulk Tag Extravaganza

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

user 348513

Member

The bulk update request #1312 has been rejected.

create alias eda_clawthorne (467) -> eda_clawthorne_(the_owl_house) (0)
create alias luz_noceda (154) -> luz_noceda_(the_owl_house) (0)
create alias lilith_clawthorne (190) -> lilith_clawthorne_(the_owl_house) (0)
create alias willow_park (19) -> willow_park_(the_owl_house) (0)
create alias gus_porter (3) -> gus_porter_(the_owl_house) (0)
create alias emperor_belos (15) -> emperor_belos_(the_owl_house) (0)
create alias amity_blight (124) -> amity_blight_(the_owl_house) (0)
create alias edric_blight (25) -> edric_blight_(the_owl_house) (0)
create implication alador_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> the_owl_house (1748)
create implication odalia_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> the_owl_house (1748)
create implication emira_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> the_owl_house (1748)

Reason: Someone changed all the character tags. Which is fine, but all those original tags had implications that need to be carried over. Also some stray implications

EDIT: The bulk update request #1312 (forum #316444) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

bitWolfy

Former Staff

What is the point of this?
The names seem unique enough to remain as is.

Besides, this isn't going to work like that.
A bunch of these tags imply the_owl_house - that implication needs to be removed before this can go through.

bitWolfy

Former Staff

The bulk update request #1314 is active.

create alias eda_clawthorne_(the_owl_house) (0) -> eda_clawthorne (467)
create alias luz_noceda_(the_owl_house) (0) -> luz_noceda (154)
create alias lilith_clawthorne_(the_owl_house) (0) -> lilith_clawthorne (190)
create alias willow_park_(the_owl_house) (0) -> willow_park (19)
create alias gus_porter_(the_owl_house) (0) -> gus_porter (3)
create alias emperor_belos_(the_owl_house) (0) -> emperor_belos (15)
create alias amity_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> amity_blight (124)
create alias edric_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> edric_blight (25)
create alias alador_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> alador_blight (25)
create implication alador_blight (25) -> the_owl_house (1748)
create alias odalia_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> odalia_blight (86)
create implication odalia_blight (86) -> the_owl_house (1748)
create alias emira_blight_(the_owl_house) (0) -> emira_blight (55)
create implication witch_(the_owl_house) (807) -> the_owl_house (1748)

The emira_blight -> the_owl_house implication is already proposed in implication #40281.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1314 (forum #316449) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

user 348513

Member

bitwolfy said:
What is the point of this?
The names seem unique enough to remain as is.

Honestly I agree. I'm not the one who changed them (shrug)

user 348513

Member

A-ha, got the culprit.

Nice work Spiteful Oni (user #987551, can we still blip users?) you ABSOLUTE genius /s

Tho I'll admit witch_(the_owl_house) as a species tag is a good idea, was getting tired of using the elf tag

Furrin Gok

Member

showmebruv said:
A-ha, got the culprit.

Nice work Spiteful Oni (user #987551, can we still blip users?) you ABSOLUTE genius /s

Tho I'll admit witch_(the_owl_house) as a species tag is a good idea, was getting tired of using the elf tag

Blipping somebody requires using the blip mode, not the forum mode. All you have to do is include their name in the blip. You can also include a name in a forum post or an image comment to make them show up if they decide to check for their name in these settings, which requires them to actually check--the only thing that leaves a giant message for them is a DM.

  • 1