Topic: [BUR] Twinkle Toes

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #1300 has been rejected.

create implication 2_toes (12143) -> toes (431249)
create implication 3_toes (132832) -> toes (431249)
create implication 4_toes (160512) -> toes (431249)
create implication 5_toes (58218) -> toes (431249)
create implication 6_toes (76) -> toes (431249)
create implication toe_claws (165274) -> toes (431249)

Reason: I'm tired of typing the number of toes and toes separately...just have them imply...

EDIT: The bulk update request #1300 (forum #316340) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

bitWolfy

Former Staff

Well, I'm happy to inform you that all of those (except for toe_claws) already imply toes.
It's been like that for years.

And the toe_claws -> toes might not always be accurate, as pointed out in topic #12188.

Updated

bitwolfy said:
Well, I'm happy to inform you that all of those (except for toe_claws) already imply toes.
It's been like that for years.

And the toe_claws -> toes might not always be accurate, as pointed out in thread #12188.

ah, I see. Thanks, Bit
You're a Janitor? I thought you were Privilege.

bitWolfy

Former Staff

closetpossum said:
ah, I see. Thanks, Bit
You're a Janitor? I thought you were Privilege.

Yeah, I was given a staff position about 6 months ago.

  • 1