I’m currently working on a total of 7 stories, and just one of those stories is a Vore story. So for the sake of this Vore story, I’ve come here with a series of questions:

1. Do antlers have more trouble digesting than bones?

2. Are cervine skulls harder to digest than equine skulls, and would that skull have any chance of surviving a Dragon’s digestive system, coming out somewhat intact?

3. If a body was lit on fire, would it digest easier?

4. How might a series of bones still be intact after venturing through a predator’s digestive tract? Is there a way to retain some resemblance of the former prey?

5. What makes Vore super hot to you?

PS: If you’re wondering about number 3, trust me, it’s not as bad as it sounds. I have the link to the prior story here if you want to read it:

https://www.sofurry.com/view/1652578

1) No. Antlers are bones. They start as cartilage which converts to bone under a layer of velvet. The velvet eventually rubs off to reveal the bone of the antlers, which eventually die and fall off as the year ends. As such, they're full of vital nutrients such as calcium and are often eaten by small mammals faster than other bones.

2) Deer skulls would be no different than horse skulls. Still attached antlers might prove obstructive, but a dead stag isn't going to complain a whole lot having his antlers broken off and a live deer is going to be dead soon anyway. If we're going to invoke light vore, then it won't matter if the antlers are intact or not.

3) That depends upon the length of time the fire is maintained. After all, humans have used fire to roast, toast, and cook their own meals, including lighting bonfires over a carcass to cook it.

4) That depends on the predator. If it's something like an owl, an entire skeleton can end up in its pellets, albeit in a disassociated state. If it's something like many reptiles who take their time digesting their prey, then there's not likely to be anything recognizable coming out. Mammals generally dismember their prey while eating it, so anything that comes out is not likely to be in a very recognizable state.

5) When the predator is lit on fire.

clawstripe said:
1) No. Antlers are bones. They start as cartilage which converts to bone under a layer of velvet. The velvet eventually rubs off to reveal the bone of the antlers, which eventually die and fall off as the year ends. As such, they're full of vital nutrients such as calcium and are often eaten by small mammals faster than other bones.

2) Deer skulls would be no different than horse skulls. Still attached antlers might prove obstructive, but a dead stag isn't going to complain a whole lot having his antlers broken off and a live deer is going to be dead soon anyway. If we're going to invoke light vore, then it won't matter if the antlers are intact or not.

3) That depends upon the length of time the fire is maintained. After all, humans have used fire to roast, toast, and cook their own meals, including lighting bonfires over a carcass to cook it.

4) That depends on the predator. If it's something like an owl, an entire skeleton can end up in its pellets, albeit in a disassociated state. If it's something like many reptiles who take their time digesting their prey, then there's not likely to be anything recognizable coming out. Mammals generally dismember their prey while eating it, so anything that comes out is not likely to be in a very recognizable state.

5) When the predator is lit on fire.

Lol, thanks, that last one made me laugh.

Though in this story’s case, if the predator were lit on fire, she’d be unaffected due to being a Dragoness, and in fact, would become encased in a state of euphoria since the fire is a type of aphrodisial flame.

Imagine being encased in an anomalous fire that inflicts as much pleasure as an ordinary flame would inflict pain. They say fire is one of the most painful ways to die, so it’d feel incredible to experience the exact opposite than the apparent agony.

Of course the prey still dies prior to being absorbed, but arguably in the most humane way possible.

Normally I am attracted by themes that have to do with Natural Sciences (Physics, Chemestry, Biology,...)

But here I think that I have nothing to add. @Clawstripe answered the questions in such a precise and concise manner.