Topic: Tag Implication: daisy_dukes -> jean_shorts

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

daisy_dukes already implies shorts, but for some reason, jean_shorts are not implied (even though Daisy Dukes are denim by definition, and pretty much always blue). Can we fix that? Please and thank you.

Updated by user 59725

DSR1337 said:
daisy_dukes already implies shorts, but for some reason, jean_shorts are not implied (even though Daisy Dukes are denim by definition, and pretty much always blue). Can we fix that? Please and thank you.

I'd be fine with this. Although it should technically imply demin_shorts.

I don't know of any other related tags that this overlaps at least (and considering tag_group:clothes doesn't even have shorts, I doubt there is one).

Updated by anonymous

parasprite said:
I'd be fine with this. Although it should technically imply denim_shorts.

I don't know of any other related tags that this overlaps at least (and considering tag_group:clothes doesn't even have shorts, I doubt there is one).

Well, there aren't any of that tag, whereas jean_shorts exists.

Much like how M/M, M/F, M/C, etc.--the same tagging system used on /r/yiff--would be more correct--at least, less confusing-- than gay, straight, male on cuntboy, etc., but the former are what we have.

Updated by anonymous

I thought that Daisey Dukes could be any really short shorts, but we're usually denim. I'll admit I rarely if ever use the term though

Updated by anonymous

Figured it out. Daisy_dukes is actually aliased to cutoffs. I didn't notice that before.

In other words, when you tag something with daisy_dukes it gets automatically replaced with clothing, shorts, denim_shorts, cutoffs.

Since demin shorts and jean shorts are two names for the same thing, it is actually being tagged with the denim/jean material in mind.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1