Topic: (fixed) unimply strapon -> dildo BUR

The bulk update request #1033 is active.

remove implication strapon (13019) -> dildo (93195)

Reason: The dildo isn't necessary visible:
post #2798873 post #2796161 post #2789596 post #2782960 post #2778366 post #2772012 post #2746296

EDIT: The bulk update request #1033 (forum #312099) has been approved by @slyroon.

Should be "remove implication", not "remove alias". +1, once you fix that.

crocogator said:
Should be "remove implication", not "remove alias". +1, once you fix that.

At least I made a BUR this time. So, I can fix it... ffs I hate ADHD 😒

Yeah, removing this implication does make sense.

I'm also wondering if it would make sense to un-alias strapon_dildo -> strapon, then implicate strapon_dildo -> strapon. This would apply to most strapon posts, but it would help to differentiate between a strapon_dildo and a strapon without a visible dildo. It would also help for posts featuring a strapon with an attached sex_toy that isn't a dildo.

d.d.m. said:
Yeah, removing this implication does make sense.

I'm also wondering if it would make sense to un-alias strapon_dildo -> strapon, then implicate strapon_dildo -> strapon. This would apply to most strapon posts, but it would help to differentiate between a strapon_dildo and a strapon without a visible dildo. It would also help for posts featuring a strapon with an attached sex_toy that isn't a dildo.

But if my BUR gets approved, you could just search for strapon -dildo
When a BUR gets approved, does it, in this case, remove dildo from strapon posts automatically?

The dildo tag won't be removed from strapon posts automatically. The tag will have to be removed manually.

I guess my main question is if other sex_toys can be used for strapons? If only dildos are used for strapons, then there probably won't be any need to un-alias strapon_dildo.

d.d.m. said:
...tag won't be removed... automatically... have to be removed manually.

After thinking about it, this would be a terrible idea. Recently peeing and urine was unimplied. Removing it automatically would make lots of people very unhappy, I guess xD

d.d.m. said:
...if other sex_toys can be used for strapons?...

I can't imagine one.

I noticed this anomaly for quite some time. It made sense to me to remove it. Technically you could put anything improvised into the harness and use it, but I haven't stumbled across an example. I just noticed that the sex toy isn't always visible, and I kind of treat it like it is its own type of sex toy.

The bulk update request #1033 (forum #312099) has been approved by @slyroon.