The bulk update request #1012 is active.

Reason: This BUR orientates by the cum_on_* tags
I also added some peeing_on_* tags that don't exist yet, but could in the future.

If you don't like it, feel free to tell me why. I appreciate change suggestions, if you have some.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1012 (forum #311870) has been approved by @slyroon.

The peeing and urine tags were recently de-implicated (topic #27098), so I don't think we should be mixing them up again.

wat8548 said:
The peeing and urine tags were recently de-implicated (topic #27098), so I don't think we should be mixing them up again.

I know. And I think that's good. But if you can tell that someone pees on a body part or an object, the urine has to be visible.

The peeing_on_eachother tag doesn't have a space and it should have a space. That being said, I think the broadness of possibilities this could occur would rule out it always counting as watersports unless watersports is generically defined as getting urine onto someone else for any reason. such as after death through death_piss, or accidentally (accidental watersports might be an interesting tag actually), or during a diaper change. These would all be super uncommon events mind you.

- peeing on poop should not imply scat and you should refer to poop as feces. This tag is also inconsistent. It doesn't imply the urine_on_x format like other tags in the BUR do.

Correct me if I am wrong, peeing on would only be used if the peeing was actually happening and not after the fact.

thevileone said:
The peeing_on_eachother tag doesn't have a space

added

thevileone said:
...or accidentally accidental watersports...

I'd say watersports is something that happens on purpose, for sexual pleasure. I don't know why I added it in this bur for two tags, which aren't necessary sexual.

thevileone said:
should refer to poop as feces... doesn't imply the urine_on_x format...

Didn't know that. Changed. And added

thevileone said:
Correct me if I am wrong, peeing on would only be used if the peeing was actually happening and not after the fact.

I use it for the body part that's hit by the stream.
This would be peeing_on_face + urine_on_ -face/-neck/-chest/-penis/-feet/-floor
post #2638341

The bulk update request #1012 (forum #311870) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #9375 is pending approval.

remove alias peeing_on_belly (4) -> peeing_on_stomach (32)
remove implication peeing_on_stomach (32) -> urine_on_stomach (53)
remove implication urine_on_stomach (53) -> urine (26690)
create implication urine_on_belly (704) -> urine (26690)

Reason: Urine for a lot of trouble
It should be belly rather than stomach

Followup:
alias peeing_on_stomach -> peeing_on_belly imply peeing_on_belly -> urine_on_belly

Also for these compound tags why is belly used as an umbrella term to indicate both belly and midriff?

The bulk update request #9376 is pending approval.

remove implication peeing_on_penis (187) -> penis (1547723)
create implication urine_on_breasts (187) -> breasts (1735745)
create implication urine_on_butt (135) -> butt (1012833)
create implication urine_on_foot (98) -> feet (613706)
remove implication peeing_on_feces (13) -> urine (26690)
remove implication peeing_on_feces (13) -> feces (14948)
create implication urine_on_feces (17) -> feces (14948)
create implication urine_on_feces (17) -> urine (26690)
create implication peeing_on_another (1365) -> urine (26690)
create implication urine_on_balls (290) -> balls (1056887)
create implication urine_on_tongue (94) -> tongue (847868)
create implication urine_on_sheath (31) -> sheath (89189)

Reason: Removing redundant implications and creating /moving relevant ones. imply peeing_on_another -> urine is because peeing does not always imply urine, but this case does and there's no point to a tag called urine_on_another.

Should we have peeing_on_own_face? We have urine on own face and peeing on face.

There's peeing_on_tree, peeing on clothing, but without their urine counterparts, should that be changed?

Also should peeing_on_* imply peeing?