Topic: [REJECTED] Public Nuisances ('public' BUR)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #882 has been rejected.

mass update subway -> rapid_transit
create alias subway (753) -> subway_(disambiguation) (0)
create implication rapid_transit (408) -> urban_rail_transit (139)
create implication double_decker_bus (4) -> bus (1264)
create implication locomotive (219) -> vehicle (49560)
create alias public_place (42) -> public (52804)
create alias public_showers (0) -> public_shower (411)
create implication public_aquarium (31) -> public (52804)
create implication public_bath (109) -> public (52804)
create implication public_bath (109) -> bath (6016)
create implication public_bathing (9) -> public (52804)
create implication public_bathing (9) -> bathing (12015)
create implication public_birth (87) -> public (52804)
create implication public_birth (87) -> birth (2813)
create implication public_masturbation (1999) -> masturbation (158854)
create implication public_pool (117) -> public (52804)
create implication public_restroom (5350) -> public (52804)
create implication public_shower (411) -> public (52804)
create implication public_shower (411) -> shower (16749)
create implication semi_public (994) -> public (52804)

Reason: Some aliases/implications pertaining to public (Derived from topic #25305). Disambiguating subway since it could be used for the subway train (currently aliased to rapid_transit) or for the restaurant (subway_(restaurant)). Also including a few other public_transportation implications. Let me know if anything on this BUR should be edited.

Edit:

EDIT: The bulk update request #882 (forum #309555) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Updated by auto moderator

If anyone can help cleanup public_nudity/public_exposure, I would be very appreciative and thankful.

I've been trying to cleanup these tags so that public_nudity was used for nude characters, and so that public_exposure was used for mostly_nude and clothed characters. Trying to clean these up by myself has been slow and time consuming, but public_nudity/public_exposure should be cleaned up before the implication public_nudity -> nude from topic #22076 is approved.

create implication locomotive -> train

I don't think a locomotive with nothing else attached counts as a "train".

d.d.m. said:
If anyone can help cleanup public_nudity/public_exposure, I would be very appreciative and thankful.

Could you give us an idea of where you left off? (Preferably a post ID plus whether you were going forwards or backwards in time.)

I've been considering taking a crack at it but I didn't want to get in your way.

  • I'm not too familiar with trains, so I don't know the difference between a locomotive and a train. I'll edit the implication to instead be locomotive -> vehicle.
  • I was checking posts with the search public_nudity clothing -nude, since that was an easy way to find posts that were actually public_exposure instead. However, I never made much progress on these and new posts largely reduced the progress I had made. I wasn't able to review public_exposure at all. Looking through the individual tags public_nudity and public_exposure would be the most straightforward and thorough method, but would also be time consuming. Thank you so much! :)

d.d.m. said:

  • I'm not too familiar with trains, so I don't know the difference between a locomotive and a train.

A locomotive is the vehicle which provides the motive power for a railroad train. When it's attached to various cars, a train is formed. However, a train doesn't need a locomotive proper to exist, such as with trams, subways, and bullet trains.

Alright, I was finally bored enough to make a start on cleaning up public_nudity. I searched for public_nudity -nude, which reduced the results to 8 pages, and then I replaced the public_nudity tag with public_exposure on each post for which the former did not apply. I started from the last page and worked backwards, to minimise the work of keeping track of new posts. Currently I've completed pages 7 and 8, which had the side-effect of reducing the number of pages to 7. post #1666763 is the newest one I touched.

I assume that people tagging nude on mostly_nude images most likely is a problem, but not one restricted to public scenarios, so we probably don't need to massively increase the scope of work required here. In fact I was surprised at the number of posts I found which were correctly tagged with mostly_nude, clothed, even casual_exposure... except that public_nudity was also there.

  • 1