Topic: [REJECTED] A Not-So-Usual Blood BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Monsterbomb10010

Member

The bulk update request #843 has been rejected.

create implication unusual_blood (945) -> blood (48294)
create implication lava_blood (2) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication glowing_blood (41) -> unusual_blood (945)
create alias red_blood (3) -> blood (48294)
create implication orange_blood (25) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication yellow_blood (47) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication green_blood (145) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication blue_blood (247) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication purple_blood (146) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication pink_blood (119) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication brown_blood (9) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication grey_blood (3) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication black_blood (123) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication white_blood (8) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication rainbow_blood (22) -> unusual_blood (945)
create implication blood_drip (624) -> blood (48294)
create implication blood_drip (624) -> dripping (131747)
create implication excessive_blood (184) -> blood (48294)
create implication blood_everywhere (2) -> blood (48294)
create implication blood_everywhere (2) -> messy (43409)

Reason: Giving other blood tags attention...

See also: topic #28136

EDIT: The bulk update request #843 (forum #308586) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

SNPtheCat

Member

The bulk update request #6500 is active.

create implication blood_drip (624) -> blood (48294)
create implication blood_drip (624) -> dripping (131747)
create implication excessive_blood (184) -> blood (48294)
create alias blood_everywhere (2) -> excessive_blood (184)

Reason: [color]_blood implies unusual_blood through colored_blood tag already, red_blood is already aliased, and the unusual types of blood already imply unusual_blood.

blood_drip and excessive_blood have been canonised with aliases, so im fitting them with all the other necessary aliases and implications too.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6500 (forum #390399) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

dba afish

Member

I wonder if unusual_blood really should imply blood, actually. the implication's already active from another BUR, but... I dunno cuz like, unusual_lactation dosn't imply milk... I guess the other unusual_bodily_fluids tags imply their respective "normal" fluid. but also, like, maybe they shouldn't in all cases? (unusual_urine should probably imply peeing instead, at least.)

I feel like this should imply bleeding instead, but umm... apparently that's just totally aliased away?

:/

  • 1