Topic: Bondage BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Leotheairwolf

Member

The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (76) -> bondage (117038)
create implication tongue_bondage (76) -> bound (169477)
create implication tongue_bondage (76) -> tongue (864911)
create implication hair_bondage (60) -> bondage (117038)
create implication hair_bondage (60) -> bound (169477)
create implication hair_bondage (60) -> hair (1792823)
create implication wings_tied (1472) -> bound (169477)
create implication self-bondage (206) -> bondage (117038)
create alias toe_bondage (49) -> toes_tied (926)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

Bregggo

Member

leotheairwolf said:
The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (76) -> bondage (117038)
create implication tongue_bondage (76) -> bound (169477)
create implication tongue_bondage (76) -> tongue (864911)
create implication hair_bondage (60) -> bondage (117038)
create implication hair_bondage (60) -> bound (169477)
create implication hair_bondage (60) -> hair (1792823)
create implication wings_tied (1472) -> bound (169477)
create implication self-bondage (206) -> bondage (117038)
create alias toe_bondage (49) -> toes_tied (926)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

I believe the implications should be Tied (a specific way of being bound) -> Bound -> Bondage (can refer to the state of being bound, as well as the acts of bindng and unbinding, neither of which would should be considered being "bound").
I'd otherwise agree.

  • 1