Topic: Bondage BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Leotheairwolf

Member

The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (75) -> bondage (114829)
create implication tongue_bondage (75) -> bound (166083)
create implication tongue_bondage (75) -> tongue (847872)
create implication hair_bondage (59) -> bondage (114829)
create implication hair_bondage (59) -> bound (166083)
create implication hair_bondage (59) -> hair (1757070)
create implication wings_tied (1444) -> bound (166083)
create implication self-bondage (196) -> bondage (114829)
create alias toe_bondage (48) -> toes_tied (907)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

Bregggo

Member

leotheairwolf said:
The bulk update request #736 is pending approval.

create implication tongue_bondage (75) -> bondage (114829)
create implication tongue_bondage (75) -> bound (166083)
create implication tongue_bondage (75) -> tongue (847872)
create implication hair_bondage (59) -> bondage (114829)
create implication hair_bondage (59) -> bound (166083)
create implication hair_bondage (59) -> hair (1757070)
create implication wings_tied (1444) -> bound (166083)
create implication self-bondage (196) -> bondage (114829)
create alias toe_bondage (48) -> toes_tied (907)

Reason: List of bondage tags that should probably imply bondage and being bound.

The only one here I'm not sure of is wing_bondage and wings_tied Other body parts use the <body part>_tied format. Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on that.

I believe the implications should be Tied (a specific way of being bound) -> Bound -> Bondage (can refer to the state of being bound, as well as the acts of bindng and unbinding, neither of which would should be considered being "bound").
I'd otherwise agree.

  • 1