Topic: [REJECTED] Various Ori series implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #652 has been rejected.

create implication ori (2) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication ori_and_the_blind_forest (0) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication ori_and_the_will_of_the_wisps (0) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication guardian_spirit (1829) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication ku (0) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication moki_(species) (129) -> ori_and_the_will_of_the_wisps (0)
create implication mokk_the_brave (3) -> ori_and_the_will_of_the_wisps (0)

Reason: Implications for the Ori series
Ori (the character) is a guardian spirit (the species), but I'm fairly certain that characters don't get their species implied. Correct me if I'm wrong.

EDIT: The bulk update request #652 (forum #304140) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #1238 is active.

mass update moki -> moki_(artist)
create alias moki (1) -> moki_(disambiguation) (18)
create alias moki_(ori) (0) -> moki_(species) (129)
create implication moki_(species) (129) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create alias mokk_(ori) (0) -> mokk_the_brave (3)
create implication mokk_the_brave (3) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication guardian_spirit (1829) -> ori_(series) (1977)
mass update ku -> ku_(ori)
create alias ku (0) -> ku_(disambiguation) (0)
create implication ku_(ori) (58) -> ori_(series) (1977)
mass update sein -> sein_(ori)
create alias sein (0) -> sein_(disambiguation) (0)
create implication sein_(ori) (58) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication seir (20) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication naru_(ori) (24) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication kuro_(ori) (5) -> ori_(series) (1977)

Reason: More tags, alternate process.
alias ori_and_the_blind_forest -> ori_(series) would come afterward.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1238 (forum #315490) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

furrin_gok said:
The bulk update request #1238 is active.

mass update moki -> moki_(artist)
create alias moki (1) -> moki_(disambiguation) (18)
create alias moki_(ori) (0) -> moki_(species) (129)
create implication moki_(species) (129) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create alias mokk_(ori) (0) -> mokk_the_brave (3)
create implication mokk_the_brave (3) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication guardian_spirit (1829) -> ori_(series) (1977)
mass update ku -> ku_(ori)
create alias ku (0) -> ku_(disambiguation) (0)
create implication ku_(ori) (58) -> ori_(series) (1977)
mass update sein -> sein_(ori)
create alias sein (0) -> sein_(disambiguation) (0)
create implication sein_(ori) (58) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication seir (20) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication naru_(ori) (24) -> ori_(series) (1977)
create implication kuro_(ori) (5) -> ori_(series) (1977)

Reason: More tags, alternate process.
alias ori_and_the_blind_forest -> ori_(series) would come afterward.

Bump.
remove implication ori (2) -> ori_and_the_blind_forest (0) create implication ori (2) -> ori_(series) (1480) create alias ori_and_the_will_of_the_wisps (0) -> ori_(series) (1480)
can be removed as it has already been done (so no followup is needed).
How did you vote on your own BUR? I thought that was exclusive to staff.

Watsit

Privileged

snpthecat said:
How did you vote on your own BUR? I thought that was exclusive to staff.

It used to be possible when BURs were originally made available to normal users, but that was removed at a later point.

The bulk update request #8703 is active.

create alias moki_(character) (0) -> moki_(disambiguation) (18)

Reason: Using this BUR to bump this BUR above

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #7817 is active.

change category moki_(disambiguation) (18) -> invalid
mass update moki_(disambiguation) -> moki_(artist)

Reason: everything under moki_(disambiguation) -moki_(artist) has the moki_(artist) tag Nothing under that search now
Artist category got brought over to the invalid tag

EDIT: The bulk update request #8703 (forum #409613) has been approved by @scaliespe.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1