Topic: [REJECTED] Re-alias pantless and no_pants to the new pantsless tag

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

jacob said:
And, once again, that's being pedantic when literally everyone uses pantsless, not pantless.

Citation needed?
Besides, even if it was the commonly used variant, you can alias it to the correct term.

bitwolfy said:
Once again, it's pantless, not pantsless ._.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pantless

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pantsless#English

"Alternative form of pantless". Alternative, not incorrect.

bitwolfy said:
Citation needed?
Besides, even if it was the commonly used variant, you can alias it to the correct term.

I don't know about "everyone", but I would certainly go for "pantsless" over "pantless" (my spell checker doesn't like either, FWIW). If I'm not wearing pants, I'm lacking pants, I'm pants-less. Pant is a separate word meaning to breath heavily, not a thing to wear.

Bump pls. This is literally just restoring an alias which always existed and which nobody proposed to remove, but had to be temporarily removed due to limitations of the BUR system. In the meantime no_pants has somehow managed to accrue 21 posts.

  • 1