Bulk update request #589
Reason:
Example of absorption_vore:
post #2297951
In this image you can see that the pred (the yellow bear) isn't using any orifice or mouth to "eat" the prey (the blue fox), so this can be considered absorption_vore.
Absorption_vore often is confused with digestion and other types of vore, usually anal_vore and cock_vore where there is an orifice so they can't be considered absorption_vore.
Example of soul_vore:
post #2272519
In this image you can see the pred (the female fox) consuming the soul (the prey) of a raccoon, this can be considered soul_vore because the prey is a soul, if the pred is a soul or a spirit it isn't soul_vore.
Soul_vore is subject to be tagged with other *_vore tags because the only thing this tag tells is that the prey is a soul, not how the soul is being consumed or if it has already been consumed.
With the implication soul_vore -> absorption_vore, the only method the pred (the consuming one) can use to "eat" the soul is absorbing it (without using the mouth or any orifice).
There are a lot of post where absorption_vore with soul_vore are wrongly used; these are some examples:
post #1227918 post #55498 post #2273621 post #2383350
In the first image the pred is clearly using the mouth to eat the prey, so this is oral_vore and soul_vore, not absorption_vore and soul_vore.
In the second image the pred is clearly using the pussy to "eat" the prey, so this is unbirthing (vaginal vore) and soul_vore, not again absorption_vore and soul_vore.
The third image is an example of disposal where the prey has been digested and now expelled, in this case throught anus, in cases like this you can't tell the method used by the pred to "eat" the prey so you can't tell that the pred has absorbed the prey or "eaten" him orally.
The last image is an example, like the previous one, of after_vore where the prey has already been eaten, and you can't tell how.
EDIT: The bulk update request #589 (forum #302987) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator